A Young Woman’s Voice Does Not Break, It Grows firmer

I first discuss what being a feminist means to me and the dreams and visions I had prior to becoming a parent as a young woman who wanted to have it all. I will then focus on what my daughter’s arrival has meant and what has changed or been challenged. Finally, I share my experience about the dilemmas and compromises of (r)evolutionary love, dealing with grief and the healing and life-transforming potential of telling and sharing our diverse narratives of feminist parenting and re-creating solidarities that were eroded by conjugated patriarchies. I use an intersectional approach as per Crenshaw’s use of the term: “Because the intersectional experience is greater than the sum of racism and sexism, any analysis that does not take intersectionality into account cannot sufficiently address the particular manner in which Black women are subordinated” (40). This allows me to focus both on my intersecting vulnerabilities and my intersectional privilege (Cho et al).

I Did Not Have to Decide to Become a Feminist: Life Happened

I have not always wanted to be somebody’s wife or life partner. Or a mother. I was born and raised in Senegal in a family of five girls, and one boy, who was also the last child. My parents kept trying for a boy until he was born. In a society valuing boys over girls, no wonder my parents chose the name “Amine” for him: a prayer answered in Arabic. My sisters and I were very close friends. This is where my first ideas of sorority and solidarity were forged as well as the belief that we shared a common life experience.

In addition, all my education—primary and secondary—was spent in all-girls schools. My family is not rich, but we have never lacked anything. I was quite a tomboy; I practiced karate, football, and other physical sports, such as “au-drapeau” in the streets with my friends (like in the picture below—you do not need to know where I am: I am all of them).

pexels.com

I played sports until my mother decided it was time for my older sister and me to start learning how to cook and take care of a house—to learn to be wife material. We were in secondary school then. Fortunately, my little sister was allowed to pursue karate classes, and she even ended up with a black belt. As for my brother, he never experienced any such restrictions or preoccupations; he did not experience curfew as we did, his male privilege protected him from that.

As for me, though very calm and reserved, I remember at around ten years old having a tough fight with an older male childhood friend because he had said “girls are stupid.” I calmly waited until we arrived in a quiet street under construction and full of tar, and then politely asked him, “Can you please repeat what you said earlier.” He did. I fought him and sat on him telling him, “Next time, think twice before saying stupid things,” and I covered his face with tar. Other than my early feminism and quarrelsome nature, I was a shy bookworm who loved writing short stories and poems in her mathematics book for the entire class to read. I also wore a veil for three years, not only for religious reasons but also as a way of protecting my new femininity and learning to deal with it, after past experiences of abuse.

I left Senegal at the age of eighteen to pursue higher education in France. Being far away from my sisters, as well as being the only member of my family to be abroad, came with a dose of responsibilities and duties; my parents did not spare any occasion to remind me that I am from a “very honourable” family and that I should keep behaving in a way that would not bring shame to them. During my third year of study, I learned that my father had married a second wife. For him, Islam allowed him to marry up to four wives. My mother accepted this because of i) religion, ii) love, and iii) culture. I did not take it well, hence family ‘mediation’. After all, the self-nominated mediators asked, who was I to want to be consulted on an issue that was only the business of my two parents? Faced with so many mixed feelings and above all rage, uncontrollable rage, I would write long letters to my mother and other long letters expressing my hate of the double standards of the hypocritical society in which we were raised—one that only knew how to make women seem small. I decided to contribute in an anthology on polygamy, which gave voice to people living in a polygamist household and who most of the time did not make the decision to live that life. I convinced my mother to write a piece, too. I think it helped us both to move ahead, with our scars. Writing became a way for me to take care of myself and of my feelings. To talk back. I did not know Audre Lorde then. But I was echoing what she once said: “what is most important to me must be spoken, made verbal, and shared, even at the risk of having it bruised or misunderstood” (Lorde).

Up to that moment, I viewed my father as a feminist. He empowered us, his daughters and his boy, constantly. He invested in our education and encouraged all our creative passions. I have now made peace with the fact that his polygamy was his choice of life and have learned not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. My father was still loving and caring; he still inspires me on many other levels. But these family experiences created a deeper consciousness of my gender and influenced the choices I would make immediately after. Change city. Change university. Find a job. Be financially autonomous. Write a novel. Have it published. Change my course of studies. Focus on my studies. Make my own decisions. Own them. I started reading the works of African feminists and the work of other African women writers. I also started writing more and more and was glad to find out I was standing on the shoulders of giants.

(Not) Teaching My Mother How to Give Birth2

After finishing my studies, I returned to Senegal to work there despite starting a relationship with my now husband. It mattered to me that I work in my own area of specialization after so many years of studies, and it mattered to him to resume his studies. Then my older sister got married, followed by my younger sister. My now husband and I were still dating. I became the focus of my entourage and especially that of my mother. I was still living at home at that age, not only because most unmarried women did but because I wanted to spend time with my family after so many years abroad. For many years, I kept teasing my mother: “you and I will stay in the house after you marry everyone else away.” Every day was about resisting her sarcastic comments: “menopause is not far away you know” or “a job is not a husband.”

My mother’s comments were based on a culture according to which “taaru jigeen sëy la,” or “the beauty of a woman lies in marriage.” This widespread belief makes it so difficult for single women, whereas single men are not subjugated to any form of pressure or social surveillance. No matter what her professional achievements are, or whether she wished at all to be married, a woman’s respectability and her social status depend on her getting married and showing she is able to produce children, preferably males ones, for society.

With my return after my studies, I got involved with an organization focusing on young women’s rights. In fact, the year of my return to Senegal coincided with the adoption of the gender parity law, which required political parties to ensure that at least half their candidates in local and national elections are women. This allowed Senegal to rank at seventh place worldwide in 2017 and second in Africa after Rwanda. The country is predominantly Muslim but is renowned for its secularism and prides itself on its decades of peace and security. I, for instance, grew up as a Muslim but went to a Catholic school. Yet my country is also one whose criminal code prohibits abortion except when undertaken to save the pregnant woman’s life; moreover, LGBT rights are not protected. Homosexual acts are defined as “acts against nature” and are punishable by up to five years imprisonment. All of this makes Senegal a country of contradictions, where patriarchy today is the legacy not only of French colonization, but also of Islam and its strictures, which were also imported to West Africa. All of these kinds of patriarchy collude with culture to subjugate women and younger men. Yet these versions of culture (and religion) are mostly a legacy of colonialism, which used religion and different tools, such as taxation, to divide and rule (some call it “govern”) while reengineering gender identities, family roles, and, hence, domestic power dynamics.

Although this chapter is not primarily about how coloniality has survived colonialism, I think it is worth giving an example. Even though matrilineal societies are often patriarchal in specific ways, they also contain empowering dimensions: in matriarchal groups, such as the Sereer, the links between one’s mother’s brother and sister and their child are close, and they can inherit from the maternal uncle. However, matrilineal groups (descent through the mother’s line, such as in the Sereer ethnic group) or bilineal groups (descent through both the mother’s and father’s line, such as in the Wolof ethnic group) are becoming more and more patrilineal (descent through the father’s line, such as in the Pulaar-Fulani ethnic group) (Diop). This is important because whereas patrilineal groups are almost always patriarchal—power and descent converge—the same cannot be said for matrilineal societies, which are more egalitarian. Most women and girls are becoming more and more subjugated to male domination in these societies. Therefore, what is happening in these ethnic groups is a tangible example of how cultural practices have also been moulded by colonialism, which colludes with religion and customary but not traditional laws to influence the law, making it more difficult for Muslim women, for instance, to inherit land or other assets in an equitable manner, whereas, traditionally, they were entitled to it the same way their male siblings were. Therefore, these contradictory dynamics make it difficult to discuss any definitive single story about women and girls in my society, especially when it comes to rendering Global South societies technical for development. Returning to my country and becoming increasingly conscious of the gender dynamics at play—even in my professional life as I was the youngest in the entire organization—was very awakening for me and made it clear that I, too, needed to join women’s social movements because my silence would not protect me.

After three years of a long-distance relationship and working in policy research and development, I decided to resume my studies and obtained a scholarship to study for a postgraduate degree in the United Kingdom. As for my partner, he had finished his studies and resumed his professional life. We were finally ready, so we decided. In a relatively small and intimate ceremony in Senegal, we got married—to my mother’s surprise.

My mother is my bedrock, my inspiration. And despite being profoundly attached to some traditions and apparently being a perfect wife and confidant to my father, I knew better. She was a concentré of power, subtlety, determination, resilience, and courage. Being the eldest of my grandmother’s large family, my mother was the only one out of twelve except for the last born to have completed higher education. When she was in high school, she would walk kilometres and save the money she was given for her food and transportation to school to help provide for her younger siblings. When she was in high school, newly-married and pregnant with my older sister at nineteen, she received the very prestigious Prize of the President of Senegal in Philosophy and Spanish. She decided to stop going to university to focus on her family after two hectic weeks of waking up early only to find overcrowded classrooms; she also felt not only torn and exhausted but also guilty about leaving her newly born alone. When she was pregnant with me the year following her joining university, she was admitted into the very competitive Senegalese School of Fine Arts, from which she would graduate and become a professor of fine arts and an artist. But my mother’s career did not reach the heights it should have had in other circumstances because of many sacrifices she made for her family.

Even though she cheerfully admits that her biggest pride is us—her children—she also reminds us often that “for a woman to succeed in her life, she has to make a lot of sacrifices for her family.” I did not agree, and I did not like the word “sacrifice.” I still don’t. But I realized with my mother and other women around me that a woman’s success in my society was gauged by her ability to forget herself and put her husband and her children first. I did not want my success to be a synonym for sacrifice or renouncement. And I am glad that twenty years later, my mom is learning to change her perception of success and wellbeing. She invested her time and efforts to obtain another master’s degree, even when it meant the whole family had to study with her and support her for each assignment, turning it into a public debate at home. My mother is also taking the time to travel outside the country. When she was younger, she had opportunities to participate in international art exhibitions, but she always declined because of us. After all, “the mother of a family has no time to travel. But she has time to die” (Bâ 110).

What affected me the most was her twenty-one-year-long fight to recover the land she lost to a large-scale infrastructural development project by the state. I find it inspirational that she did not lose her will and confidence to reclaim her rights as a citizen and to speak truth to power. This contributed to my fascination in land issues—“la passion foncière” as I call it. My PhD focused on the land rush in Northern Senegal’s agricultural sector. It nurtured my fascination for telling stories with nuances as well as for documenting resistance, solidarity, and struggles. I did not want to tell a single story but nuanced stories with their many outcomes. Through using feminist methodologies, I wanted to document the power dynamics associated with gender and age. As a result, my interest for personal narratives and life stories increased.

Becoming a Mother

Just after our marriage, we moved to London, I from Senegal and he from France, after leaving his job. Soon after, our families started pressuring us again, this time, to have a child. We resisted. I was studying, and he was just starting his career after finishing his studies. We decided that we clearly were not ready. A few years after the wedding, the situation became worse with people within our entourage even insinuating that I (not him) had health or fertility issues and that we should consult a doctor. We decided not to pay any attention. He was even the first to cut short such conversations and questioning, as it was no one else’s business.

Many months after, we decided we were ready to have a child. This was in the first year of my PhD. I remember wanting to have it all in my early twenties: pursuing my writing, starting my doctoral studies, being more financially autonomous, and then, maybe, having a child. I did not publish a second novel, although I was still writing, but all the rest happened in that exact order. We thought then that it was the best time, as I could do my fieldwork while benefiting from the support of my family in Senegal and I could write from anywhere, as my type of studies was part time.

I became pregnant immediately after we started trying, and I can remember knowing so intimately the exact moment I felt pregnant, despite the five or six pregnancy tests telling me otherwise. I kept buying them until one test indicated that I was one to two weeks pregnant a few days later.

Three months into the pregnancy, after knowing the sex of our baby, I wrote a letter to her promising to guide her into this world while remaining true to ourselves. Our families, though in Senegal, started making a lot of recommendations: I should cover my body and my head, avoid working at certain times (before 7:00 a.m., between 1:00 pm and 2:00 p.m. and after 7:00 p.m.) to avoid the “evil eye,” and be more obedient to my husband because the character of my future child and her destiny depended on my being a good wife. This reminded me of my many readings about how in my culture, the uterine descent or mother’s line is said to transmit blood (dereet), character (jikko), and flesh (suux) to the progeny, while the patrilineal descent determines the nerves (siditt), the bones (yax), and courage (fit) (Diagne; Diop). If both descents are important, the matriline is, in reality, given more significance because it is supposed to determine the qualities of the children through the mother’s milk (meen). To illustrate this, only the matrikin is said to permit the transmission of witchcraft (ndëmm) to the offspring; also, the success of the children is said to depend on the mother’s behaviour as illustrated by many Wolof proverbs, such as “ligeeyu ndey, añup doom” (“a mother’s work is lunch for her children”). This saying means that women who endure their marriage will have successful children. As for the father’s line, it transmits the surname to the child who belongs to the father’s family, who is supposed to be responsible for the women and children.

Despite being broke at the time, we wanted a proper naming ceremony for our daughter with a couple of friends. We, however, decided not to follow some of the prescriptions of our ethnic group to name a daughter after her grandfather’s sisters. We decided to give her the two first names of our mothers, my middle name (which all our children will bear, if there are others), and her father’s surname. This was because I was more attached to my middle name, Rama, than to my father’s surname, which I had, nonetheless, kept after our marriage because my religion, Islam, advises that a woman doesn’t change her name after marriage.

Throughout my pregnancy, I continued being a whole woman; I explored any facet of life I had interest in and kept my options open. I worked on my PhD project while travelling and working and exercising until my eighth month of pregnancy.

Becoming a Feminist Activist-Scholar Mother: A Young Woman’s Voice Does Not Break

Before the pregnancy, we had discussed several times our ideal future. Of course, I wanted to resume my professional life after my doctoral studies, but I had never been very at ease a with fixed nine-to-five job. I enjoyed being a scholar-activist at the same time. However, I did not understand that being a new mother would, in fact, lead to reorganizing all of my other activities around it. Just when I found out I was pregnant, I had launched a series of interviews with scholars, activists, artists, and policymakers on issues of interest to the continent. As an early African researcher geographically based in the United Kingdom, I wanted to initiate a dialogue with other young Africans in the diaspora and on the continent on issues of mutual interest. Did my pregnancy trigger my wish to be more of an activist trying to decolonise and democratise knowledge while abolishing boundaries between policy research and action, and contributing to the legacy we would transmit to the ones yet to come? I don’t know. I am still thinking about the role of the intellectual, but it is certainly not a role that only requires thinking without transforming the world(s) we have in common. In my dream feminist future, I would work just a few hours per day to earn a living—the necessary amount to be comfortable. Becoming rich has never been a life objective for me. I was, therefore, also thinking about financial sustainability.

The final week of the pregnancy was fast approaching. After four days of going to the hospital and being returned home, labour finally started on a Tuesday night. After several hours of gas and air, screaming, laughing, and crying, our daughter finally arrived the following day by water birth. This allowed us both to play an active role during the delivery. My husband in particular was the one doing extensive skin-to-skin contact with her while I was sleeping. I was grateful I did not have any stitches; I just felt sleepy and hungry afterwards. The first few days of us returning home were sleepless as well as emotionally and physically exhausting, but we were amazed by her.

After her arrival, life as we knew it was over, as were the certainties and the values my mother inculcated in me. We decided we would invent a new path for our family. And for the two parents we were, our naivety to believe we could be a nice feminist family was a blessing in disguise. The likely scenario for our team was that I would be the main caring parent (I thought I could work on my PhD from home) and he would be the second parent. But then, I realized that was not what I wanted. I did not work hard to start a PhD only to suddenly renounce to everything because of motherhood. We decided to have a child together; we would share the tasks equally. We had several conversations, often stormy, and we finally came to the agreement to share the tasks equally accordingly to financial contribution. I had four days and he one initially because I had a student budget. But I decided it was unfair because of all the emotional and unpaid care work I was also doing when I was at home with her. I started working part time from home when my daughter was sleeping and when I was not working on my research project. As for my husband, he started developing his own projects before we decided to have a child. But with pregnancy, his wish to work for himself and be able to design his own business model and have more flexible working hours became stronger. Therefore, he started to work part time for another company while working on his project the rest of the time. And just after the birth of our daughter, he resigned from his job and started working fulltime on his project with his business partner. He initially started working four days a week and worked from home the rest of the week, when he would be the main carer. Eventually, he started working three days a week away from home and two from home to take care of our daughter while I was at the university library. I reckon we were able to reorganize ourselves and reach our dream parenting balance because of his intersecting privileges (Cho et al): the flexibility of his job came from a firm and carefully designed agreement on what we wanted our parenting our child to resemble.

After welcoming our daughter into this world, we were tired, but little did we know that what we were experiencing at the time was the mildest level of tiredness. Fortunately, a few weeks after our daughter was born, my mother came to London from Senegal to spend a month with us. And with her visit, I rediscovered how being a mother is valued in my society: the massages that are provided to both mother and baby, and the special preparation of the mother’s food for her to have the nutrients she and the baby need, and the long hours to rest. Some women even leave the marital house to return to their parents’ house to rest and be taken care of. All of which I did not have in London, and even breast-feeding in public is still an issue.

Soon after, with the prospect of resuming my studies after a six-month maternity break, I realized my biggest challenge would be to reconcile my new role of mother with those of expatriate, feminist, passionate wife and lover, resourceful student-researcher, reader, and tireless traveller. I was torn between the refuge-cocoon that I had built since I became a mother and the prospect of returning to a busy life. Also, at the beginning of the adventure of mothering, I was not able to find the precious time I used to have to spend with myself; the sweet solitude that I loved to slip into in order to read, write, feel, meditate, and reflect was only but a memory. When my daughter was sixteen months old, I decided to stop the breastfeeding, and then a few weeks after, we found a nursery place for her. She went three days a week, and each of us had her for one day a week. Since we had found an emotional, social, financial, and love balance after the initial earthquake of parenting, I decided to resume participating in academic conferences, which is an important facet for any researcher (or researcher-to-be). This forced me to familiarize myself with all the logistics behind #PhDoingWhileParenting, and I was struck by a harsh reality: 95 per cent of conference organizers refuse to take care of the additional cost of travelling with a baby, even if she is breastfeeding. Several times, I had to buy her ticket (thankfully only 10 per cent of the price of my ticket), find a babysitter while in London, and arrive a little earlier so that the nanny got to spend time with my little one in my presence for her to get used to being without me (the settling period). During the conferences, I had to escape during lunch and coffee breaks to breastfeed and spend time with my little one.

We decided to resume our respective activities. In March that year, I had to go to Cape Town, South Africa, for a program on leading in public life. From our first interactions, the organizers made it clear that they would not take care of my daughter’s ticket but encouraged me to wait until the following year. I refused because I believed mothers are the first leaders in public life, and it was out of the question for me to exclude myself. My husband was able to find a babysitter, thanks to his circle of friends in the Cape area, where he had worked for a while. Imagine the cost of a baby ticket and two weeks of babysitting on a student budget. But I took part anyway, and this program transformed me. But this intensive program was also a marathon. While my daughter was resting well in our hotel room, I went on all-day rounds to breastfeed and spend time with her. I’m proud to have also had an impact on the organizers, as they have decided from now on to take care of the costs for babies (less than one year) of parents who take part in the program—it was not retroactive, though.

After this conference, I went to another trip in Southern Africa. This conference went well, but the return flight was catastrophic, as we were taken off the plane in Lusaka on suspicion of a contagious disease. I was in an unknown country and was forcefully removed from the plane with my baby because I expressed the fear that I might have an allergy after I started itching. Despite finding a bed bug in my clothing, which I showed to the flight attendant, I was taken out of the plane and left with the promise I would be booked another flight if I brought the proof of my fitness to travel. When my colleagues and passengers dared to interrogate why I was taken out for examination, since I had nothing—even a doctor proposed to consult me on board—they were all made to sit down and mind their own business. Then I let my anger explode, which led to the police and security being called, who threatened me to stop filming the scene with my camera and then threatened to separate me from my daughter if I did not leave the Emirates plane. Yes, there it was: Misogynoir! The intersection between racism and sexism to make me—yet another angry black woman who dared to resist and speak up—shut the fuck up!

When I returned to London, I was traumatized. Even the messages of support, sympathy, and encouragement from friends left me with this bitter taste of doubt. Then I resolved: if I let this experience traumatize me, my relationship to parenting, to mothering, and to my social relationships would be transformed forever. I started to firmly agree with Ama Ata Aidoo that “a girl’s voice does not break, it grows firmer.” Having an academic and a professional life for a Senegalese woman living in Europe, especially in England, has emotional, social, and financial costs, but this is not a reason to systematically refuse invitations or to not ask that the cost of travelling with your little one be covered if you travel with her, as I do. Even if the response is a no, I go anyway because it is important to continue to occupy these spaces and not to exclude myself. And when I do go, I undertake another type of advocacy around why we need to occupy these spaces with our children.

At home, I started talking more to my child about feelings and how to express them and manage them, and to my husband; I voiced my anger whenever I felt it and encouraged them to do the same. I started listening more to his laments and his intersecting vulnerabilities, especially around toxic masculinity, which would constantly judge him because he wanted to be another type of father for his daughter—one that would be more present, express his feelings, and encourage her to respect her opinions and her body and to know that she was enough. This reminded me of an anthology exploring Fathers and Daughters relations edited by Ato Quayson. In his chapter Voyage Round my Daughter in Quayson’s anthology, Simon Gikandi shares the following:

Stories of fathers and daughters … are weapons against the stigma that we African men are condemned to bear in our sojourns in the world of the other. We know what this stigma is because we live with it—the unquestioned assumption, irrespective of our family traditions and communal backgrounds, irrespective of our relation with our mothers, sisters and daughters, that we are the last custodians of an unrelenting patriarchy…. And yet, we know, as do our mothers, sisters, and daughters, that our connections to the rules of matrilinearity run deep and that our daughters are the constant reminder of our ordinariness. (68-69).

I also started paying more attention to my daughter’s firm and sharp little “noes” with the body gesture please—no to strangers trying to play with her or touch her, no to the bottle, or no to wearing shoes when she just wanted to run on the grass barefoot. When we started hearing her out, she tried, much to our surprise, the calm and soft “yeah,” as if she were breathing at last. I too was breathing. And I also loved the time she and I would spend reading. I loved the bond it created between us, and I am glad I transmitted to her my love for books, and that it is even one of the first words she said.

Much to my disappointment, motherhood was not all rosy. I realized society had a certain way of making mothers feel unwanted and disposable as well as in a constant nervous condition, especially in those areas outside the family—except if we redefined the line and demanded not to be put into boxes. Travelling with a baby is not easy; far from it, nor is working or studying. I realized that most spaces are hardly baby- or family-friendly, especially as far as mothers are concerned. Although I recognize the privilege in being able to afford travelling to attend conferences with a baby, I started questioning the whole politics of the whole academic world and the way it treated mothers and fathers, making it difficult for the two roles to be compatible or even punishing them for choosing to parent. And my partner, who took four months of paternity leave, was treated by his coworkers like a curious beast or was overcongratulated for only doing his parenting responsibilities. People also asked him about where I was any time he said he was alone with his daughter.

Six months into parenting came the prospect of doing my doctoral fieldwork in northern Senegal, which implied being separated from our new family: I would have to go away alone for two periods of three months with my child and without her father. But we were also anxious because I was living in areas of rural Senegal where I had never lived myself. I decided to go anyway, the fear for me was that I would definitively abandon my studies if I did not go. Moreover, despite the sadness of the upcoming separation with his little one, my husband was also convinced that I had to go without him, as he could not leave his job. The trip to Senegal began with a trip to Morocco for the three of us. We decided it was important to spend time together before the separation.

It Grows Firmer!

With resuming my research came another unexpected project: an anthology project on feminist parenting. The book project was born when my daughter and I travelled to Senegal for my doctoral fieldwork. In Dakar, where we stayed a few weeks before travelling to rural Senegal, our two families celebrated their first meeting with their granddaughter and niece. Apart from my mother, who had spent a month with us in London when she was born, all of them were only just meeting her.

One day, I was at home with my mother, sister, daughter, and our cousin, who is a nurse. She had come home called by my mother to pierce my daughter’s, her namesake’s, ears. For more than two minutes, I powerlessly watched my daughter cry. Then I left the room, and when I returned, it was done. Yet she was still crying. That day, I started reflecting about the choices we make for our child and the choices we think are ours. Since my daughter was born, my parents and sisters in Senegal would ask “Have you shaved her? Have you pierced her ears? Are you massaging her?” I would answer no to the first two questions and yes to the last one. In fact, I was not massaging her; my mom who came to visit us after her birth was.

I did not say anything because I knew the virtue of massaging for babies. Yet I could not help but interrogate my mother when she would say the function of each massage was to shape her body to render it more feminine, including good hips “that will allow her to give birth without difficulty” and a more preeminent booty. She explained to me before leaving London that normally my daughter would have to wear a pearl necklace that would keep her neck high. She had reminded me several times that I should go and have myself some massage sessions. I do respect and defend many cultural practices not only because they are part of my heritage and because I value them but also because I felt the need to overcome the myths about African cultures being backwards and reconnect with my roots, for they have been beautifully passed on from generation to generation. For instance, I have always admired how in Senegal, women who have just given birth are taken care of. I also from time to time have loved to challenge those who follow any cultural practice simply because that is the way things should be. Therefore, having my mother keep asking me questions about her grandchild getting her ears pierced even after she left must have reawakened my mischievous side. And frankly I had not particularly reflected on those questions and just thought it wasn’t a priority, since my schedule on those first months was quite hectic. I must have asked once at the medical centre whether they pierced babies’ ears and they answered they did not. Then I might have decided it was not that important. But witnessing the cries of my daughter because I was too much of a coward to say, “No, she will decide when she grows up,” left me with the firm decision I would not let such a thing happen again.

Reflecting on how to articulate my resistance, I decided that writing and organizing collectively to amplify parents’ voices on feminist parenting was crucial, especially by mobilizing such experiences in the non-Western world. How was it that I saw rarely African and Global South feminists publicly discuss the issue of feminist parenting? Was it because after long, secular struggles to prove they could work outside the house, some of them did not want to return in the private sphere and decided not to reclaim parenting as a prime and fertile political site? Or was it still the old debate between womanism3 and African and Black feminism(s)? Wasn’t there any value of reclaiming anything domestic, since many feminists saw motherhood as one of the principal reasons for women’s subjugation to patriarchy: the vile production and repro-duction to sustain capitalism(s) and patriarchies? Or was the erasure of African and Global South feminist parents’ (and children)’s agency because they needed to be (re)presented as only poor women and girls without any agency—an image dear to the mainstream aid and development industry? All these reflections led me to return to the writings from the non-Western world. From familiarizing myself with the writings of Western feminists such as Adrienne Rich’s Of Women Born, I then migrated all the way to Chimamanda Ndozi Adichie’s Dear Ijeawele and Oyèrónké Oyèwùmí’s What Gender Is Motherhood?. My child was then eight months old. The Feminist Parenting book project has been an adventure for me, and I believe for the other parents involved as well, because the idea came from personal reflections about the way I wanted to relate to my child—the way I found myself doing it because I am in a heterosexual couple, and the way the outside world is also intervening and sometimes mediating, facilitating, and disrupting my parenting practice. I wanted to know the personal history of every contributing parent and how each understood their story of feminist parenting, including the why and the why not as well as the how and under which circumstances. It was a collective learning process for all of us through the owning, telling, and sharing of our experiences. It has been an adventure.

Passing on Life and Love, Dealing with Grief and Bringing the Village Back In

My older sister, Anta, recently passed away, a few hours after giving birth to her third healthy child. It was not a natural death. It was not an accident. It was medical error. This awakens so many questions for me: how feasible and realistic is conceptualizing feminist futures when women are still dying from giving birth in 2019? This shows how the personal remains political and how the economic is also political. The lack of adequate health infrastructure, as well as the lack of qualified provision of health services, kills. The lack of basic social services kills. Corruption kills. The lack of accountability kills. The lack of agency to articulate and exercise one’s civic rights kills. Poverty kills. These are eminently political issues. These are, indeed, feminist issues. At the moment, I am thrown into the emergency of learning to deal with my grief and learning to help mother her children—the same way that Anta came with me to northern Senegal when I was conducting fieldwork and helped and supported my work, and nurtured my child as her own. I am now—with her husband, my parents, my grand-mother, and my sisters—part of the army of other-parents who have stood up to continue her legacy and take care of her children. She left us the hard task of dealing with her presence-absence and the joy of bringing the collective back into the labour of love that is parenting. No doubt it will not be a peaceful and tranquil journey; it will also include difficult debates and consensus making.

More than ever, alone in the crowd with my grief, together in family, I believe in the power of collective organizing and in the power of storytelling as a way to be present to one self and to show up for others. As Amina Mama says,

Writing offers us the means to move beyond the crush and confusion of the immediate present. Writing also offers us the chance to maintain our sense of who we are, self-respect intact, in the knowledge that we have challenged the paradigms bestowed upon us by histories and herstories that have not been of our own making. As such it is often therapeutic as well as political, subversive as well as transformative. Above all it is an irresistible temptation. Write, rewrite, and write again. (20)

Conclusion

Raising a child is difficult, and it requires kindness to and solidarity with parents. In this chapter, I have shared how the legacy of parenting from my mother and my own realities led me to also invent another way to coparent with my husband and to build bridges with other individuals from mostly non-Western backgrounds and in the diaspora who also identify as feminist parents. Parenting is also such an important terrain that I believe it must be repoliticized because educating our children not to dominate or oppress is not only a fight against our patriarchal and capitalist societies but also a fight against the self. Parents have so much potential power in their hands that I believe there is much potential in rethinking the way we parent and the way we let also our children guide us into parenting them better by constantly negotiating our shared relationships, iteratively and endlessly talking back to them and listening to them, as well as reengineering our much fluid and nondefinitive parenting pact. Parenting my daughter and my sister’s children has taught me to be kinder to my parents and to other parents and carers around me. Parenting is truly a labour of love, and the goal is for everyone to remain alive and together in the end, despite the extremely bumpy and less travelled road.

Endnotes

1. Taken from Aidoo, Ama Ata, “A Young Woman’s Voice Does Not Break, It Grows Firmer.”

2. The quote is taken from Warsan Shire, Teaching My Mother How to Give Birth. flipped eye publishing, 2011.

3. “Womanism” is a term coined by Alice Walker in In Search of Our Mother’s Gardens: Womanist Prose to conceptualise a definition of feminism that is not based on gender equality but on race and colour. It is universalistic, and she defines a womanist as “A woman who loves another woman, sexually and/or nonsexually. She appreciates and prefers women’s culture, women’s emotional flexibility … [she] is committed to the survival and wholeness of an entire people, male and female. Not a separatist, except periodically for health … loves the spirit…. loves struggle. Loves herself. Regardless” (xi-xii).

Making a Conscious Choice to be a Mother

The journey to become a black woman academic in South Africa, before the ending of apartheid in 1994, was not an easy task. There were very few black women positioned as lecturers or senior lecturers at the time and certainly none that we knew as professors (currently only 2 per cent of the professors in South Africa are black women). In Cape Town, where I lived and worked, we were a relatively close knit group of black junior lecturers supporting each other while competing in a highly cutthroat individualistic academic environment—an environment ready for neither black women professors or for black intellectuals more generally. In the 1990s, through the Southern Africa Political Economy Series (SAPES), based in Zimbabwe, a few of us were able to engage with powerful African feminists, such as Patricia McFadden, Ruth Meena, and Rudo Gaidzanwa. We defined ourselves as feminists and fought to have feminism included in the curricula of our respective disciplines in our universities. As we progressed with and/or completed our degrees, many of us were of the age when decisions about having children were being made.

I can still recall some of those conversations and the conscious choices we, for various reasons, made to either have or not have children. Becoming a mother through the act of giving birth (for there are other ways of becoming a mother and of mothering), or choosing not to, is therefore a conscious decision for feminists. Making a choice to become, and when to become, a mother is the first act of feminist mothering. Deciding whether or not to be a mother breaks with the patriarchal assumption that motherhood is a natural destiny for women, that a woman’s place is in the home, and that her roles in society are primarily located in the spheres of reproduction and nurturing. The ability to exercise choice is also closely associated with the freedom to do so and with the security that this provides.

Although I was in my mid-thirties when I gave birth to Malaika, I had already pondered about having a child in my early twenties and had named my prospective child then already. Malaika is a Swahili name meaning “my angel.” The name was made famous in a Swahili song written by the Tanzanian musician Adam Salim in 1945, and is sung by, among others, the South African musician Miriam Makeba in the 1970s. The choice of my daughter’s name is itself a reflection of my early pan-African leanings.

Although motherhood was definitely in my realm of personal identification, I also knew that it would not be the only role that defined me. I was curious about the world and wanted to study and travel. I was passionate about resisting injustice in all its forms, and I wanted to make a meaningful contribution to the transformation of our societies. I believed I could do all those things—have a fulfilling career and also being a mother. However, to accomplish these goals, I was also cognizant of the fact that I would have to delay having a child until at least some of my goals were accomplished. By this time, I was already approaching the age when women begin to worry about their fertility and hear echoing phrases about biological clocks ticking.

At the time, I thought I had prepared myself sufficiently to make the decision to have a child. In hindsight, nothing really prepares one for the changes that accompany having a child. It is not merely the physical transformation of one’s body or the sudden realization of how much time a baby can consume that is a shock. It is also the acute awareness that your child is completely dependent on you for its physical, emotional, and intellectual wellbeing and that you are now responsible for its survival.

After my PhD comprehensive exams at the University of South Carolina, I had delayed writing my thesis. However, once Malaika was born, I completed the thesis pretty quickly. I became constantly aware of time constraints and I realized that if the thesis were to reach completion, I would have to write it while Malaika was sleeping. We lived in Toronto, Canada, at the time, so there was little in the way of family support.

Soon after I graduated, I was awarded a one year postdoctoral fellowship in the United States, which meant I would be in the United States during the week and in Canada on the weekends. There was quite a bit of guilt about this arrangement, as it had me away from my daughter for substantial periods of time. When her father and I separated, this became a bone of contention because her father could now claim primary caregiving responsibility during the period of my fellowship. At the time, however, it was what I needed in order to progress in academe. The choice between childrearing and career advancement is one that the majority of women have to navigate. For those who choose both, it often comes at an enormous personal expense. This was no different for me. It was then, too, that I made a conscious decision not to have another child.

After the postdoctoral fellowship, I decided to move back to South Africa. Again, I had to make a conscious choice between staying with Malaika in Toronto or going home to where I thought I could make a more meaningful contribution (since I was unable to take her home with me at the time due to a custody dispute). Although it was one of the hardest personal decisions I have had to make, I do not have any regrets about it. Malaika remained in Canada with her father while I went back to my previous position at the University of the Western Cape. Upon my return, I spent a lot of time trying to get her to join me. This experience, I think, also contributed towards my feminist mothering. It was important for me not to feel disempowered or confined because I was a mother and to engage the custody dispute from a position of strength, even if that meant being away from Malaika for a year.

We do not cease being mothers when we are away from our children. Our care takes on different forms. It is, however, important that we nurture ourselves first so that we can be the best mothers we are able to be. Being a mother should be a conscious feminist choice; how we chose to perform the role of motherhood should be, too.

Mothering Malaika

Malaika joined me in South Africa a year later. Although she saw her father, who lived in Toronto, on holidays and he has always been present in her life, the primary responsibility for her wellbeing was now mine. I, however, had friends, family, and a helper in South Africa who gave me the necessary support I needed. Without that support network, it would have been extremely difficult to pursue the career I now have, which went from academe to the NGO sector and back to academe as a professor of politics and international relations. My work entailed a fair amount of travel on the continent. It could only be undertaken if others assisted with the caregiving responsibilities of motherhood—cooking, cleaning, babysitting, and ensuring that children got to school on time. I was, therefore, never a conventional mother. My child complained all the time that I was not at parent-teacher meetings or there to pick her up from school—I was not a “soccer mom.” I saw my role more in terms of inculcating values, norms, and discipline as well as earning enough money so that we could live a relatively secure lifestyle.

Malaika, therefore, did not grow up in a home where there was conventional parenting or a sexual division of labour. In her father’s home, he did the cooking and cleaning, and in our home, I was not the person undertaking these tasks, which has also affected the ways in which she has interpreted these roles—she does not align them to a particular gender.

I am an independent woman who has been able to succeed in career spaces in which men dominate. Malaika has often had to listen to me talk about the difficulties of my work environment and has had to listen to me prepare to give various talks. It was important that she and other young women see that they can be anything they want to be and that it takes commitment and passion to be successful. It is also important for our children to understand that we work not for individual success but for the greater good, that we are part of a collective, that we confront challenges while speaking truth to power, and that we seek to create a more just and equitable world. Having a feminist consciousness is about having a social consciousness.

I did not sit Malaika down to teach her. There is no curriculum for this. Feminist mothering is not about instructing. It is about creating different experiences and exposing children to diverse sets of gender and social relations through engagement, conversation, literature, film, culture, and so forth. It is about creating an awareness about power relations and promoting the values of equality and dignity that should be present in all our relationships. Malaika was part of our dinner table discussions; she also watched documentaries and movies with me, and had access to my books. Through the people I interacted with, she was also exposed to a world where gender constructions were debunked and where people could freely express their sexuality.

There were no men in the house, and she went to an all-girls school, which gave her the added confidence she now has as a woman. She did not have to spend her formative years competing with boys at school and/or competing with girls for their attention.

She did however have to deal with the race issue. South Africa was and remains highly racialized and a rather inward-looking society. She often had to deal with racism at school and within the extended family. In as much as I wanted to shield her from those experiences, I also wanted to equip her to be able to have the consciousness and emotional security to be able to traverse those encounters. In order to do so, I had to expose her to a world beyond the narrow confines of South Africa and its identity constructions.

In my own development, redefining myself as a pan-African feminist and working towards the greater good of women across the continent was liberating. Such a transformation enabled me to situate myself in a larger collective of people who have had similar experiences and who have been agents of their own destiny. I wanted Malaika to discover this, too. Only time will tell how far this has resonated with her, but telling signs are already there. I have seen her struggle with her identity construction and emerge from that inner contestation as a self-aware black woman actively claiming and embracing her identity.

I was, therefore, not surprised that she was one of the first students at her school to want to wear her hair in its natural curl, which led to many others at the school following suit and to a protest by learners at the school who wanted to wear their hair naturally that received international attention. There is now a change in the policies of many schools in South Africa for how black children can wear their hair. During the organization of the protests, I saw her grab my Angela Davies books and read them. A year later, Fanon and Biko disappeared from my book shelf. She was, therefore, grappling with the intersectionality of race and gender in South Africa.

By the time she entered university, I knew that my work as a pan-African feminist mother was largely done and that she now had to go and explore the world further on her own. Feminist mothering, I would like to believe, endowed her with the necessary confidence to chart her own way in this world. I look at her and I am proud of who she has become. I cannot talk about school plays or sports trophies, but I can speak about motherhood that enables a daughter to have the kind of sense of justice and equity that we need more of in the world. These are the values and beliefs that have emerged from my years of pan-African feminist mothering.

Malaika’s Narration of Her Experience

Within the past two years of my life as a university student, the issues of patriarchy, gender-based violence, race, cultural sensitivity, and many other crucial social issues have come to the forefront of my thought process. Every day, I learn more and more about how to navigate my way through the world as a young woman of colour. Every day, I learn more and more about what that means and how my identity both disadvantages me in wider society and how it nuances my human experiences. It is in these day-to-day moments of learning that the idea of feminist mothering becomes increasingly important to me.

My mother is by her own definition a Pan-African feminist. This identity is something that has framed her life in a multitude of ways: from the work spaces she inhabits, the books she reads, the music she listens to, and the social spaces she finds herself in. Growing up, there was nothing I could do but follow these same patterns of behaviour. Without much note at first, as her daughter, I have absorbed her teachings in such a way that being in her presence allowed her to teach me without her lecturing to me. In her lifetime, she has done feminist work both in and out of academic spaces. Hearing her think aloud made me, as a youth, grapple with issues concerning women’s place in both academe and wider society, women’s place in South Africa and Africa at large, as well as what it means to be a woman in the world. These are ideas that I find myself wrestling with more now, and, increasingly, I relate my present ideas to the notions my mother originally provided me.

Her library spans the entire back room of our home and includes Toni Morrison, Angela Davis, Buchi Emecheta and Mariama Ba. When in need of something to read before I went to bed or caught the train, I looked to her library. Thus, my mother has been an avenue to work I didn’t know I was interested in until I found it.

When I sit in my gender and writing classes in university this year, I’m increasingly shocked at the reading list. The ones I find myself enjoying most I look into who the author is. Almost without fail this year, my favourite texts have been authored by women I personally know through my mother, such as Desiree Lewis, Elaine Salo, and others—women I know as aunts and family friends. I now learn from them not only in private spaces but also in academic settings.

In my own day-to-day life, the teachings of my mother have become increasingly present. When in conversation with friends around the issues that affect us on a daily basis (whether it be what we’re learning on campus or the fact that we can’t walk through the inner city without being catcalled), increasingly I hear my mother and the women with whom she surrounds herself in my speech. I find myself increasingly able to look at social situations for not only what they are but also in terms of how I would want a feminist, nonracialized and, increasingly, more equal society to look like. This is a worldview I can accredit, in large part, to having a mother who defines herself as feminist.

Conclusion

Mothering is a conscious choice for feminists. Feminist mothering enables children to have a deeper love and respect for themselves and others as well as a deeper understanding of how the world and social and gender relations are constructed. It also provides them with a sturdy scaffolding for their own self-realization. Feminist mothering empowers both mother and child (and all others in the family) to be who they aspire to be and to fulfill their life’s purpose. Feminist mothering takes courage, as society will judge and criticize those who break the stereotypes of how a mother is supposed to behave. It is important for young feminist mothers to build personal relations with other feminists who are able to guide and support them through the very tough choices they will inevitably have to make. Feminist mothering is fundamentally about teaching the norms and values of equality and about actively working to change the power dynamic between men and women and girls and boys. Pan-Africanism is about unity, solidarity, and dignity. Together, these are transformative values. They have made a lasting impact on me, and I trust that they will inspire my daughter and many others to continue to strive for the kind of society in which we all can enjoy the freedom, dignity, and growth that have been so long fought for and by so many.

New Directions

We really hope that you’ve found parts of the book to be applicable to your family life. We set out to capture common parenting moments, since it’s usually helpful just to know that these issues arise in households around the world multiple times a day. Parents and caregivers don’t often share their kids’ worst moments with each other. No one posts a family picture of their kids screaming or fighting each other on social media. Some parents can have honest conversations with their very closest friends and family. Others can only really share the hard stuff anonymously online or in the security of a confidential office with a medical or mental health professional. Many battle through their own daily trenches largely alone. It’s only because we have the luxury of talking privately to families every day that we see how universal these struggles are. We can reassure you that no family is as perfect as it seems, no children are as well behaved, and no parents, stepparents, grandparents, etc. have it all figured out. We also have the privilege of seeing the unbelievable dedication and love that parents and caregivers have for their children. Reading this book is just one of the millions of ways, small and large, that you are caring for the young people in your life.

Neither of us ever expected to write a parenting book. We both went into mental health fields wanting to help children. What we discovered professionally is that one of the best ways to help children is to help families get out of stuck patterns of relating to one another – sometimes dating back generations. When we started raising our own children and stepchildren, it became even more obvious how much everyone in the family suffered when our kids were struggling. We also learned that, most often, our kids couldn’t change without us taking the lead, and that sometimes meant first getting on the same page with partners in caregiving. It didn’t matter how much schooling we had, how many friendships we had with other mental health professionals, or even how much time we’d spent helping other people’s kids – nothing could have prepared us for being with the kids in our own lives! Nothing can bring you the same level of joy or frustration or fear or awe. It can be so amazing that we want to hold on forever or so overwhelming that we want to turn away (even run away). When we broke it down into smaller parts, we realized that there were some universal thoughts and worries that get in the way for parents and caregivers, and also some concrete steps to being with a child through all of his or her feelings and behaviors. Inspired by our mentors, colleagues, and the great minds who came before us, we developed the framework outlined in this book to put into words some of those central ideas. We can attest that these practices have definitely made our lives at home easier, and that’s why we were so motivated to share them with you.

It’s always touching for us to hear parents’ stories after they’ve taken the risk and tried out some of these ideas at home. They often come back and report how their child finally opened up or softened and actually accepted their support. Sometimes, the benefit isn’t as obvious, but parents are still trusting in the approach and using the skills. I can think of a mother who recently told me:

It didn’t work. She didn’t calm down at all. But I just told her that was okay and that I didn’t expect her to be cheerful after such a horrible day. The next day she stayed in the kitchen with me instead of going up to her room and shutting the door like usual. So maybe I did something right?

It’s also normal for it to take a few weeks of relating in this new way to notice a difference. Change doesn’t tend to happen in a straight line; you may even feel temporary blips or setbacks before things improve, but when parents persist, there is almost always a positive change. You just can’t change one part of a relationship pattern without other parts responding in turn. Every action has a reaction, and we count on it!

fig22_1.jpg

Figure 22.1 Climbing the mountain of change

Let’s review a few of the main takeaways. First, it’s important, especially at first, to emphasize the use of the three because-statements to pivot from the culturally conditioned responses to try to make our kids’ feelings go away. They let your children know that you get them and you’re paying attention to their lives. They deepen the validation. They also keep you focused on staying in your children’s reality rather than prematurely trying to lead them out of their feeling state.

It’s also important that, as much as possible, the because-statements reflect your child’s goodness or positive intention. Even when the behavior isn’t so good (e.g., hitting a sibling to get a turn on a video game), you can still reflect the underlying feelings, wishes, or needs (e.g., you were so angry because you felt left out or because you really wanted to have a turn after waiting so long). Reflecting your child in a positive and healthy light lets them see themselves that way. You are their greatest mirror.

The order we’ve outlined of validation before reassurance or problem-solving (whenever safe to do so) also seems to matter a lot to kids of all ages. In fact, older kids tell us they are much more willing to listen to their parents’ advice when they feel understood or accepted first. You can think of it as “Feelings Before Fixing” or “Support Before Solutions.” There’s the well-known Sylvia Boorstein quote (and book title): “Don’t just do something, sit there.” She meant to sit first and be with one’s own experience before acting, and we essentially mean the same thing for parents with their children. Sitting and listening to them first then providing validation before offering advice is doing something invisible, yet meaningful and powerful.

We recommend following the structure provided until you get your feet under you and then making it your own. Once the principles feel solid (regulate yourself first, see the goodness, feelings before fixing), and you’ve wrapped your mind around the framework (build a bridge, putting it into words, getting practical), you will automatically convey what you mean to and the details won’t matter so much. In other words, don’t worry about getting it just right, especially in the beginning when you are acquiring the new skills. It can also be off-putting to kids to see their parent trying to speak to them “perfectly.” The focus is best placed on tuning in to yourself and your child, not on the “perfect words to say.” If your child feels you are genuine in your efforts, that vulnerable expression of love is the greatest gift you can give your kids, even if you stumble on your words or forget what comes next. And remember, no matter how bad things get – they want you and only you as their mom or dad or stepparent or grandparent. When there is conflict, the intensity of the discord reflects the intensity with which they want you to join them, and help them to get through their toughest moments.

Just like any other new practice, it helps to start with something relatively easy. For example, if you routinely love celebrating your child’s joy with her, you can just tack on some of the “putting it into words” stuff. If you’re more comfortable with your child’s anxiety, start with applying your new tools in these situations before moving into the more angry zones. If you have more than one child, it can also work well to start with the child whom you think will respond better. It’s not always going to go well, but every time you do it, you are making a long-term investment in your relationship with your child and their brain development. Not only will this way of responding help your children in the moment, but, over time, they will internalize the framework, and this will help them tremendously in their life as they use it themselves and with the other people around them. In other words, when you change your way of being with your child, you change the DNA of the relationship, and that gets passed along the generations. Sometimes – when I am tired and frustrated and the last thing I want to do is build a bridge (never mind put it into words) – I think of the generations past who did their best to parent us with the little science and support they had access to at the time. Then I get back up again in their honor to untangle some of those intergenerational cycles. Now if that doesn’t resonate with you, totally okay, find the meaning in your efforts so that you can draw from that well when you are struggling with the day-to-day. Sometimes consciously bringing to mind the big picture can give us perspective and take the edge off in the moment.

If you’re a bit hesitant about how this will all go, please don’t forget the “do-over.” At the start, 95% of your efforts may be “do-overs.” The first step is realizing that the interaction didn’t go as hoped after the interaction. We’re serious – that’s awesome. “Do-overs” can honestly be just as good as staying calm or present the first time. It would be weird to always be fully tuned into your child’s feelings or needs. It’s neither possible nor good for children if you “get it” all the time. Those gaps when parents are out of sync with their child help build a child’s autonomy and resilience to stress, and reconnection teaches the child that the parent–child bond is strong enough to withstand everyday wear and tear. In other words, healthy relationships are all about missing the mark and then course correction. This can mean a “do-over” with a specific interaction or even a commitment to a new way of relating altogether. These are helpful in all relationships, whether at home or elsewhere. They are especially useful in co-parenting where emotions tend to run pretty high when the going gets tough or when the family structure is changing. You can use these principles to work more effectively as a team with your partners in caregiving, and it will lower not only your stress but your child’s as well. In fact, sometimes co-parenting disagreements or stress are one of the main factors that get in the way of parents being able to build a bridge to Child Island. Your mind can only be in so many places at once! It is much easier to parent when you feel supported (or at least not distracted by) your co-parent. If you don’t feel your co-parent’s support, we urge you to “be the first domino.” It doesn’t always feel good or “fair,” especially if you feel like you’re always the one to have to take the lead, but every action really does have a reaction and your efforts will prove fruitful over time, especially if you are sincere in your intentions. Trust us on this one – we have had the opportunity to work with many partners in caregiving who were struggling to be in the same room, never mind “get on the same page” with respect to their kids and what we’ve learned is that the pain fueling both sides is most often rooted in vulnerability – fear, hurt, even shame. When this vulnerable pain can be met with kindness and support, and with no expectation for anything in return (even if just for the kids’ sake at first), magic can happen.

As parents start to focus in on listening to their children differently, they often become aware of all the inner and external distractions: work stress, overscheduling, electronics buzzing. The pace of life and the overall stress load starts to feel at odds with the deep desire to connect with our children in a helpful and meaningful way. Many parents start by focusing on communication with their children and develop more interest in knowing more about stress reduction for themselves. If you’re in this boat, you are not alone. Our generation of parents have so much on our minds. There are constant demands on our resources and attention. There are also new challenges (like our children’s digital immersion) and anxieties (like our kids’ economic and environmental future). Fortunately, we are also at a time when mindfulness practice has become mainstream, and there are many options for busy parents. All of the ancient traditions teach a form of mindfulness or “paying attention, on purpose, nonjudgmentally.” Nowadays, it is possible to find guidance around mindfulness practice from many sources: podcasts, books, secular teachers, religious teachers, and retreats. When I (Ashley) was first having a hard time as a new parent, my mentor and colleague suggested mindfulness practice. Of all the things I’ve learned and tried, mindfulness meditation has been the simplest, cheapest, and most helpful approach to managing my own stress as a parent. Our favorite title for a mindfulness book is Dan Harris’s Meditation for Fidgety Skeptics because, in real life, who likes the idea of sitting still and having to focus on your own breathing with so much going on in the background? Not too many parents, especially parents who are already tearing their hair out. If you can relate, we want you to know that there are many ways to practice mindfulness in daily life that don’t involve sitting still for 30 minutes at a time (for real!). For more information, check out the resources section for some recommended books and websites. One we particularly love is Mindful Parent, Mindful Child: Simple Mindfulness Practices for Busy Parents, an audiobook by Susan Kaiser Greenland.

If you’re interested in a group format program (a good excuse to get out of the house once a week), there are several options.

The first secular mindfulness program was pioneered by Jon Kabat-Zinn and is called Mindfulness-based stress reduction. This course is available in many urban centers and some online formats. It’s a great introduction to mindfulness practice and helps participants become more aware of and less reactive to everyday events.

Mindfulness-based parent training is an offshoot of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction designed specifically for parents. This can be especially useful if your child is suffering from a medical or mental health condition or you are dealing with stress that is particularly related to parenting.

Mindful self-compassion deepens practices that are usually introduced in other mindfulness training. As we discussed in Chapter 4, self-compassion practices can help us deal with parenting challenges, as we aren’t easily able to take space away from the issue. It is the antidote to all the unrealistic expectations faced by many parents today. We highly recommend it.

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy is geared toward people with anxiety or depression. It has been shown to be helpful for new parents and for anyone with recurrent bouts of depression.

Maybe you’re looking for something more in terms of parenting support or your child is struggling with a behavioral issue or mental health issue and you could benefit from “advanced caregiving skills.” If so, we agree with other authors like Brené Brown who suggest that parents don’t need “experts” to give advice so much as they need space to uncover and listen to their own inner wisdom. I (Adele) am definitely biased in thinking that emotion-focused family therapy (EFFT) can be helpful, as I am a co-developer of the approach. The framework captured in this book shares common roots, and the focus of EFFT is to support parents with skills and strategies to help their kids with behaviors, emotions, and their relationship. Should parents’ efforts to support their child get blocked by their fear (of making things worse), self-blame (for their child’s struggles), or other thoughts or feelings (hopelessness, grief, etc.), the EFFT therapist helps the parent to reconnect to their caregiving instincts and get back on track. Check out www.emotionfocusedfamilytherapy.org for links to a number of free videos for parents and caregivers inspired by the approach.

Traditional family therapy (where two or more members of the family typically come together) is another way to get “in-person” support to have more understanding and less conflict in the family and to put into practice some of the ideas and tools described in this book. Many parents worry that a referral for “family therapy” means “it must be the parents’ fault.” We believe just the opposite: Parents can be the biggest part of the solution, even if things have been really hard for a long while. Family therapy helps parents and kids get out of stuck patterns of relating and connect with each other in ways that better meet each family member’s needs.

Many communities offer parent guidance and support, either through in-person groups or telephone/video-coaching. You can always ask your primary care provider, health unit and/or local school for recommendations. These resources are often convenient, affordable and based on sound research evidence.

Finally, parenthood can really shake things up emotionally, so it’s not surprising that parents often become interested in understanding more about themselves or their other relationships. There is a wide range of support out there for parents, from online peer support groups to counseling and psychotherapy. For example, individual psychotherapy can be really helpful to become more aware of your thoughts and feelings and improve relationships with your kids, your co-parent, and other important others. Contrary to popular belief, psychotherapy doesn’t have to be a deep exploration of your own childhood unless you want it to be. Those interested in how childhood experiences may influence their current efforts as a parent or who are now trying to give their children experiences that they never received but wished they had, psychodynamic psychotherapy may be an ideal choice. Cognitive behavioral therapy is also widely available, is usually short-term, and focuses on “here-and-now” issues, such as negative thinking patterns and how to change them in day-to-day life. Interpersonal psychotherapy helps parents identify their feelings in the context of important relationships and improve communication with significant others. Couples therapy can be especially useful for co-parents and may center on supporting each other in your parenting role. Working on the couple relationship is often helpful to children but doesn’t need to be the main focus if you don’t want it to be. There are many other forms of psychotherapy, and in the end, the relationship with the therapist is probably the most important factor in getting the support you want.

One additional form of support I may pursue is:

A Final Word

When it feels like you’ve tried everything and nothing seems to work, it’s easy to lose hope. It can make you worry that something is really wrong with your child, yourself or your relationship. Hopefully, as you’ve used some of the ideas in this book, you’ve seen more glimmers of connection and calm. If not, then rest assured that change can take time. Children are incredibly resilient creatures. So are parents and caregivers. We are programmed to learn and grow together. No matter what your child has been through or how she is reacting right now, there is always, always hope. The bond between a child and their primary caregiver is stronger than it seems, and children want things to get better. Your child likely won’t yet be able to thank you for all that you are doing or to tell you that even when things go sideways, he appreciates how you stick by him again and again. We hope that in the meantime, you can give yourself credit for being willing to try out new things, fall, and get back up again. It is a tremendous gift you are giving yourself and your child and we so firmly believe that your efforts are incredibly meaningful.

What to Say to Kids When …

As promised, the rest of this book is devoted to scenarios where we’ll have you practice using the framework we shared with you in Chapters 1 and 2. The more you practice, the easier this becomes, but nothing replaces knowing your own kid. That’s why we’ll provide examples that we’ve found to be helpful, but it’s much more important for you to imagine what’s best for you and your child. Once you’ve surveyed the options, we’ll invite you to adapt the model to fit the particular needs of your child and your own unique style.

A couple of last points to ponder before we get started. There have been thousands of parenting books published over many decades. These often fall into two broad categories: managing behavior or helping with feelings. Just focusing on feelings can lead to both parent and child getting stuck on a merry-go-round of emotion; just focusing on behavior can lead to misunderstandings and disconnect. Our hope is to address both aspects, because both are important. It’s helpful to think a bit about which half of the equation is your natural comfort zone. If you are someone who feels at home with practical parenting strategies, you’ll probably want to pay particular attention to the parts on building a bridge, emotion translations, and putting it into words to create some balance. If you tend to tune into emotions and talk about feelings with your children more easily and readily, you may want to focus on the sections relating to getting practical, including setting limits.

No matter what your leanings as a parent or caregiver, it’s universal that kids are more flexible and bounce back more easily when the basics are taken care of. We know that kids melt down more easily when tired, stressed, or hungry. What we sometimes forget to take stock of is the state of their “emotional cup.” Kids fill up their cup through connection with the adults who love them. This may be through hugs, playing together, or just spending quality time together. Kids with a full cup will respond even more easily to the practices ahead. But if it’s been hard or next to impossible to fill their cup in these ways (maybe even because it’s been difficult to be around your child lately), not to worry. The examples in the coming pages will show how you can begin to fill your child’s cup even in the midst of the chaos of everyday life and even during your toughest moments together.

Alright! Are you ready? Let’s do this!

fig5_1.jpg

5

“I Don’t Want to …”

Let’s jump right in with the parenting scenario that is perhaps the most frequently encountered: asking our kids to do something and getting a less than enthusiastic response. When we make requests of our children, they are usually practical demands related to activities of daily living – getting dressed, eating dinner, doing homework, getting to bed. Because what we’re asking is so reasonable and necessary, it makes it even more frustrating when our children resist. If we don’t want to get stuck in the same old power struggle, we need to try something different. How we respond to their resistance can be a true game-changer.

Scenario A: “I Don’t Want to Come for Dinner”

In this scenario, let’s assume your child is playing outside with her friends in the neighborhood. When you call her to come in for dinner, she yells back, “I don’t want to! I’m not even hungry.”

The Knee-Jerk Response

Much of the time, parents and caregivers will respond with something like:

“Come on sweetie, you can go out and play later.”

“I worked hard on this meal – let’s go!”

Sometimes, especially when frustrated, one might say:

“Too bad! It’s time to eat.”

Imagine for a moment that your child says to you his or her version of: “I don’t want to come for dinner.”

What’s your most likely knee-jerk response?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

step1.jpg Step 1. Building a Bridge

Imagine you worked in an environment where you were definitely the subordinate employee. Your opinion mattered, but ultimately your superiors got the final say. They decided when you had to work, when you got to take a break – even when and what you ate. That said, you love your job, and most of the time you think your bosses are great. But sometimes it feels frustrating that you don’t have more leeway, even if you haven’t quite got a handle on the extent of your role. Now let’s use this frame of reference to remember what it’s like to be a kid and to have to cooperate with umpteen requests per day, from various adults in their life. Children, like adults, want to have some independence. This is a normal human need. Let’s also remember how much fun it was to play! As adults, we may no longer have that luxury, but play is what children do. It’s their work, their language, their joy, and something they need for their growth and development.

Possible Emotion Translations

Possibility A: “I’m having a lot of fun with my friends!”

Possibility B: “I don’t want to miss out on the next game.”

Possibility C: “My stomach hasn’t given me the signal that I’m hungry yet.”

Translations for your child:

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

*Reminder: If you are feeling stressed, upset or overwhelmed, engaging in this mental exercise can be a real challenge. You might find that taking a break or a couple of deep breaths might make it easier to brainstorm possible emotional translations.

step2.jpg Step 2. Putting It into Words

Option 1. “I don’t blame you for not wanting to come in when you’re having so much fun.”

Option 2. “Dinner is probably the last thing on your mind! Especially that you’re just about to start a new game.”

Option 3. “I can imagine you want to wait until you’re good and hungry before leaving your friends.”

In your own words:

I can imagine why you wouldn’t want to come in for dinner because __________, and because _________, and because __________.

step3.jpg Step 3. Getting Practical

Emotional support: It makes sense that a child might feel annoyed when asked to stop something he likes doing. Validating his perspective as demonstrated, including acknowledging his frustration, will help. Children need to feel that parents respect their emerging competence – that they are their own people with their own wishes who can start to make some of their own choices. Putting it into words shows that you get this, even though you are still the one setting the schedule and rules for the family. If your child is worried about missing out on something with friends, she might also need reassurance – for example, there will be a next time before too long. Seems simple (and perhaps totally obvious) but when said with sincerity, it can help to make the transition an easier one for your child’s brain.

Practical support: Competing with “fun” can be hard. This means that even after you’ve tried to put it in words and offered reassurance, many children will need you to repeat the request and set a clear limit. When responding to your child in this way (and using this sequence), you may still hear mumbles and grumbles, but it is much more likely that they will be in the house faster and with much less tension, if any.

Next time you need to call your son or daughter for dinner, you may also consider giving a 10-minute warning so that your child can mentally prepare for the upcoming transition. Some kids need a frequent countdown, and some need an adult physically close to help them through transitions. If it’s possible to offer them a bit more control over their schedule, once everyone is calm, you can sit down ahead of time and ask them what might work best to help them change tracks. This situation is a great opportunity to work on problem-solving together with your child.

Sample Script: “I Don’t Want to Come for Dinner.”

PARENT:“Hey sweets, what show are you watching?”
CHILD:(not looking away from the screen) The Friendly Forest.
PARENT:“What’s going on? It looks like Freda the Fox is being silly.”
CHILD:“Yeah, she’s pretending to be a dog. She’s wagging her tail.”
PARENT:“I can see you really like this show. We’re having dinner soon, so you’ll have to come to the table for dinner in 10 minutes.”
CHILD:(whining) “Noooo. I want to watch the rest of the show.”
PARENT:“It looks like a good one. Spaghetti doesn’t seem as fun as Freda the Fox, now, does it?”
CHILD:(still whining) “No. I want to see what happens next. I want to see why she’s trying to be a dog.”
PARENT:“I bet you do! It’s hard to go from the television to the dinner table, especially when you want to know what’s going to happen next! I bet you wish that dinner were later. I’ll tell you what, I’ll come back in 10 minutes and if the show isn’t over, we can pause it so that you can finish watching it after we eat. You can press ‘pause’ or I can.”
CHILD:“Okay, I’m going to press it.”
PARENT:“Deal. And we can try to guess over dinner why that silly fox is pretending to be a dog.”

Common Pitfalls

1. “He shouldn’t need to be told twice.” When you tell adults, “It’s time to go,” they usually get their shoes and coat on and are out the door (okay – most of the time!). Kids move much more slowly, sometimes get distracted, and sometimes get stuck. It actually takes cognitive flexibility for a child to move one from one activity to another, especially since the part of the brain responsible for “shifting sets” is not fully developed until adulthood. Depending on their developmental stage (not their age), it can be harder to do for some kids. This is especially true when the activity to which they are transitioning isn’t as “rewarding.” Because of this, it’s worthwhile to expect a certain degree of resistance as part of a normal interaction when giving a command. When it feels like disrespect, parent and child can get drawn into a standoff where both parties lose flexibility. When you assume your child is stuck rather than just oppositional, it allows you to find more productive ways to help him move forward.

2. “What’s the big deal if he stays out longer? I don’t want to be controlling.” Some of us grew up with military-style discipline and don’t want to repeat that for our children. Or we don’t want to upset a child who is finally having fun. If it really works for you to let your child have dinner later, there may be no issue; however, when children are able to refuse their parents’ requests too often, it can set up a dynamic in which the child is in control. Children feel safer when their parents are in charge and anxious when they aren’t, no matter how much they act like they prefer it. Thankfully, when you can validate your child’s perspective and stay in charge, it isn’t “controlling” but rather teaching and guiding your child to stay on track in a supportive way.

3. “I’m starting to notice that the resistance is mainly around food and mealtimes.” Good catch. There are many reasons for hesitancy around eating and mealtimes that don’t have to do with just “missing out on fun.” Some kids have trouble sitting still at the table, some have sensory issues with foods’ tastes or textures, some have anxiety about a part of the eating process, and some may be developing concerns around body image or weight. Along these lines, studies show that 25% of boys and 30% of girls aged 10 to 14 years will experiment with dieting behaviors. Dieting frequently starts in kids as young as 8. In some cases, food resistance persists and can have negative health outcomes for kids. Dieting can lead to increased risk for weight management problems, even eating disorders. If you are worried about your child’s eating behaviors, regardless of underlying cause, it is not advised to adopt a “wait and see approach.” Rather, check in with your primary care provider to discuss your concerns.

Reflections

What might make it hard for me to put into words my child’s experience in a situation like this?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

What might make it hard for me to get practical in a situation like this?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

What do I need to deal with a situation like this more confidently in the future?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

Scenario B: “I Don’t Want to Go to bed”

It’s bedtime. In some homes, bedtime comes with elaborate plans and strategies, all to avoid a one-way street to meltdown city. Kids resist bedtime for any number of reasons. They may be afraid of the dark, they are still wired from the day, or they may simply have a bad case of FOMO (fear of missing out). In this scenario, when you tell your child it’s bedtime, they cry, “Noooooo, I don’t want to go to bed!”

The Knee-Jerk Response

Much of the time, parents and caregivers will respond with something like:

“Sorry kiddo – it’s that time.”

“Honey, you’re tired and you need good sleep to be healthy.”

Sometimes, especially when frustrated, one might say:

“If you don’t get to bed in the next 5 minutes, there’s no story and definitely no screen time after dinner tomorrow!”

Imagine for a moment that your child says to you his version of “I don’t want to go to bed.”

What’s your most likely knee-jerk response?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

step1.jpg Step 1. Building a Bridge

My kid once shared this with me: “It’s not fair that kids have to sleep alone when parents always get to sleep together in the same bed! They always have company!”

How true! I had not crossed the bridge to Child Island in that way before! It is so easy to forget what it’s like to be a small kid in a big world where your sense of safety comes from being with your caregivers. Never mind the dark! Easy for us to reassure our children, even lose patience with them, since our brains have since evolved. It’s hard to remember what it was actually like to be alone in our bedrooms when our parents were still going about their daily lives without us. The same can be true with kids with older siblings. They often struggle to understand that they have different developmental needs, and so they can feel hurt or offended by the different expectations.

Other children are just too revved up to go to sleep. The child who has lots of energy before bed is no different from how we feel after too much coffee. It can be physically hard to settle down when wired, no matter how tired you are underneath. Kids may anticipate lying in bed feeling jittery, physically uncomfortable, or bored and therefore resist doing so.

Possible Emotion Translations

Possibility A: “I’m scared to be in my room by myself in the dark, and I’m embarrassed to admit it.”

Possibility B: “It feels unfair that my sister gets to stay up and I don’t. I feel like a baby when I have to go to bed and nobody else does.”

Possibility C: “I’m too energetic, and if I go to bed now, I’m just going to feel very bored and very uncomfortable.”

Translations for your child:

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

step2.jpg Step 2. Putting It into Words

Option 1. “Aw – I understand you don’t want to go to bed. It can feel a little scary to be upstairs all alone, and that’s not a good feeling.”

Option 2. “Being the first to bed is hard. I can imagine you don’t want to miss out on what we’re doing. It probably doesn’t feel fair that your sister gets to stay up later.”

Option 3. “No wonder you don’t want to go to bed, you have so much energy. It feels like we’re asking you to flip a switch and suddenly be calm when your body wants to jump around.”

In your own words:

I can imagine why you wouldn’t want to go to bed right now because __________, and because _________, and because __________.

step3.jpg Step 3. Getting Practical

Emotional support: In general, bedtime can be a great time to connect with your child. It can really help to leave some time, maybe 10 minutes, to engage in connection with your child where the only person in the world that matters to you is her. This kind of connection acts like a fuel for cooperation. Because it can be so hard in our hectic lives to find the time to do so, when you build in this very special ritual in the bedtime routine, your child may actually look forward to getting into bed – or at least they are likely to be far less resistant. If you have more than one kid, 10 minutes may not be possible, but even 2 minutes of special time can help.

Children who are anxious about separation or the dark may also need to feel your confidence in their ability to cope and manage. Once you’ve validated their feelings, it can be helpful to provide some reassurance – that the room is safe, that you’re nearby and will see them in the morning – but there is also a limit on reassurance where it becomes counterproductive. For example, checking once for monsters under the bed can be done in a way that is cute and supportive, but checking twice or three times can fuel the fear.

For the child who is more energetic or disappointed about potentially missing out on the fun, conveying that you get it and that there is always more to look forward to tomorrow can be helpful too.

Practical support: For all kids, routine and consistency can help a lot with bedtime. General principles are the following:

  1. Set the same bedtime every night (ideally on weekends too).
  2. Keep a similar routine every night (bath, pajamas, tooth brushing, story, cuddle, etc.).
  3. Use a meaningful object (e.g., blanket, stuffed toy) to help child feel more comfortable if sleeping alone.
  4. Weave relaxation and mindfulness activities into the routine. The ol’ counting sheep strategy can also be a way to calm the busy mind and body.
  5. Remember that good sleep is vital to kids’ and parents’ health and wellbeing. If the child’s emotions or behavior are controlling bedtime, then additional strategies will be needed. Please refer to the section on Sleep in Chapter 24: Recommended Readings.

*Reminder: Your ace in the hole is sincerity. Thanks to their mirror neurons, your child’s brain will register that your efforts are genuine, leading to a release of calming neurochemicals regardless of how well you follow the structure provided.

Sample Script: “I Don’t Want to Go to bed”

PARENT:“Honey! It’s bedtime. Get your jammies on, brush your teeth, and I’ll be right there to tuck you in.”
CHILD:“Aw, can I please stay up for a while longer? We just started a new game.”
PARENT:“No sweetie. It’s after 8pm already.”
CHILD:“You’re always ruining our fun. I’m not even tired.”
PARENT:“You know, I actually don’t blame you for not wanting to go to bed. Adults love to sleep, but most kids don’t want to miss out on more fun time at home. Especially since tomorrow means the start of another school day.”
CHILD:“Exactly! So why won’t you let me stay up later?”
PARENT:“So sorry kiddo. It’s time. I promise you’ll have more playtime tomorrow.”
CHILD:(getting angry) “I don’t want to!”
PARENT:“I bet that it’s hard to be told what to do all the time, and it can feel lonely in bed, especially when you know Max is still up with us. It might even make you feel like a little kid. Tomorrow after dinner we can sit down and talk about bedtime, but right now I bet you can’t beat me up the stairs to the bathroom!”
CHILD:“Fine but I get a head start!”

Common Pitfalls

1. “They just need to go to sleep.” Hard to refer to this as a pitfall because it’s true. However, if your child has been stuck in a cycle of protesting sleep, he may need some extra support to break that cycle. You may feel that your child shouldn’t need external support to get to bed or be concerned he will rely on you for too long. Trust us, kids don’t want to go to college with a stuffy, nor do they want their parents to tuck them in forever. It is normal in many societies in the world for children to sleep in bed with their parents for longer than what we consider to be “normal.” Humans evolved sleeping together for safety, and our kids’ brains are still very much wired for survival. Therefore, kids need to be taught that it’s safe to sleep alone, and some kids need a tad bit more of that teaching. And when they get a bit older and feel lonely, they may need to be taught again.

2. “My child is a master at the ‘one more thing’ strategy.” First it’s more pages of the story, then a glass of water, then a sore stomach. When kids keep calling you back over and over again, it’s enough to drive any parent up the wall. If you’re at the end of your rope, it’s really important to use the emotion translator so that you can hear what’s hidden in your child’s repeated requests: “This transition is really hard.” As you likely figured out long ago, it’s not about the water or the itch; it’s about missing you, or worry. If as above you can speak to the feeling: “You’re really thirsty, and it’s also a bit hard to say goodnight,” you can follow this up with a support strategy: “If you miss me at night, you can squeeze Mr. Dog and I’m giving him my special hug to hold just for you.” And by all means, set your limit. Nothing fuels frustration like feeling like you have to give in to every demand; it’s helpful to be clear about what you will and won’t do at bedtime, and remember that your calm and confident approach to your child is what’s most helpful.

Reflections

What might make it hard for me to put into words my child’s experience in a situation like this?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

What might make it hard for me to get practical in a situation like this?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

What do I need to deal with a situation like this more confidently in the future?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

Scenario C. “I Don’t Want to Do My homework”

In this next “I don’t want to …” scenario, let’s assume it’s time for homework. Your son really struggles with reading, and that’s what’s on tonight’s agenda. You’re already dreading it. It’s always a battle, and you’re worried he’s going to have a really negative relationship with reading, even homework in general. When you ask him to get his book out, he responds, “I don’t want to! The teacher gave us the dumbest book.”

The Knee-Jerk Response

Much of the time, parents and caregivers will respond with something like:

“I’m sure it’s not that bad. The sooner you get through your chapter, the sooner you can move on to something else.”

“Honey, you are doing SO well. You get better all the time but you need to keep practicing.”

Sometimes, especially when frustrated, one might say:

“Don’t be rude. Your teacher works hard to support your learning. No book is dumb.”

Imagine for a moment that your child says to you her version of “I don’t want to do my homework.”

What’s your most likely knee-jerk response?

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

step1.jpg Step 1. Building a Bridge

There are many reasons a child may not want to read. Children develop reading skills at different paces, and sometimes the material is just too difficult for them at that time. For children with language-based learning differences, reading can feel like asking them to build a bridge. There are so many invisible components to the task, and it’s easy to get overwhelmed without the proper supports. And imagine being asked to perform a difficult task in front of other people (even your parents); children can feel a lot of embarrassment at the prospect of letting on that something is hard for them, especially if “everyone else” can do it just fine. Other children struggle with attention span, sitting still and focusing on a less preferred activity. Even at the best of times and with no underlying cognitive issues, reading and other school tasks require mental energy and the enjoyment develops over time.

Possible Emotion Translations

Possibility A: “When I struggle to read, it makes me feel really bad about myself and I don’t want to feel that way.”

Possibility B: “The content of the book doesn’t reflect my interests, so it’s hard to stay focused.”

Possibility C: “My brain is tired after a long day at school, so the idea of doing something mentally challenging sounds painful.”

Translations for your child:

__________________________________

__________________________________

__________________________________

step2.jpg Step 2. Putting It into Words

Option 1. “I can understand why you wouldn’t want to dive in. Reading is not your favorite subject, and so I imagine it’s not a lot of fun.”

Option 2. “I bet you’re not excited to read about more farm animals; it’s too bad the book isn’t about motorcycles.”

Option 3. “I can imagine that after a long day, the thought of reading for homework is tiring.”

In your own words:

I can imagine why you wouldn’t want to do your reading homework because ________, and because _________, and because __________.

*Reminder: This step is most effective when you can use one of the sentence starters followed by three because-statements that reflect why it might make sense for your child to feel, think or act this way.

step3.jpg Step 3. Getting Practical

Emotional support: Kids (and all people for that matter) want to be valued for who they are. When they feel they aren’t living up to expectations, they can feel embarrassed or fear rejection. This is why it’s crucial to keep the parent–child relationship positive with patience and encouragement while working on homework (e.g., “you’ve worked through projects before and I’m sure we can do this together”). We know this is a tall order, yet as soon as kids sense criticism and disappointment, they are likely to shut down or want to avoid homework even more than they already did in the first place. The need here is also for acceptance of where the child is at rather than pressure to be where we want him to be. The child struggling with reading or homework also needs our confidence that he will learn and grow, as all children do.

Practical support: In this scenario and others like it, getting practical might involve some support in moving through the task. There are many practical ways to support your child with homework, one of which is to use what is referred to as a scaffolding technique (in the same way scaffolding is used around a building under construction). This means the parents or caregivers provide just enough support that children can complete the task without the adult taking over fully or doing for them what they can do for themselves. For example, a parent may demonstrate how to solve a problem or read a word, and then they step back to allow their child to give it a try. Or a parent may let their child come up with the ideas for a project but help spell the words. In some cases, reading instructions aloud to the child, helping to organize the steps, or scribing their answers may be necessary to support the child to complete the task.

Parents can also help by structuring homework time. For example, you can spend some connecting time with kids after school before homework (e.g., playing a game) and then set a timer for short bursts of focused homework time with movement breaks in between. “I’ll set the timer for 15 minutes and after that we’ll turn on the music and dance for 5 minutes before getting back to work again.”

Because it is such hard work to be a parent and homework helper at the same time, it may be more practical to work with a good tutor or advocate for extra help at school if the resources are available. You may even consider enlisting a teen from the neighborhood who needs volunteer hours or grandparents, aunts and uncles. This may be especially relevant for children with learning differences who may require extra support to help them reach their potential.

Sample Script: “I Don’t Want to Do My Homework”

PARENT:“Time to do your math homework!”
CHILD:“Ugh, I’ll do it later.”
PARENT:“I don’t blame you for not wanting to do it. Word problems are not easy, especially at the end of a long day.”
CHILD:“It’s stupid. I swear I’m never going to use this stuff.”
PARENT:“It is extra hard to feel motivated to do something that’s tough and feels like a waste of time.”
CHILD:“Plus you’re always nagging me about it.”
PARENT:“Yeah, I know, it makes it worse when we get into it with each other. On top of the work, we get into battles, which doesn’t feel good. No wonder you don’t want to get going.”
CHILD:“See! If I didn’t do homework, we wouldn’t fight! Problem solved!”
PARENT:“Yeah, it would be awesome if there were never any homework. I feel for you, kiddo. I really do. And I know you can get this over and done with before too long. Do you want to tackle it on your own or do you want to look at the book with me first?”
CHILD:“I’ll just start.”
PARENT:“You got it. I’ll come check on you in a few.”

Common Pitfalls

1. “If I validate how hard math can be, won’t he avoid the subject?” When your child struggles with a school subject, it can be scary to put that struggle into words in case it somehow makes it more likely that they will shy away from academics in general. Parents usually take on the role of cheerleader (you’ve got this!) or enforcer (you’ve got to do this!) instead. Thankfully you can breathe easy knowing that responding in the ways we’ve suggested here will actually decrease your child’s resistance, increase his engagement, and therefore, his skill and confidence. It’s also important for kids to know their own personal profile of strengths and weaknesses. One of the ways you can support your child to develop healthy school-based self-esteem is to help him to celebrate his gifts and feel okay about his difficulties.

2. “What if she never succeeds in school?” Kids spend the majority of their time in school, and so much can feel like it’s riding on school performance: their self-esteem, peer group, acceptance to college/university, career. It’s a lot of pressure on parents to choose the right schools and programs and to help kids do their very best. When a child is struggling with academics, this rubs up against one of parenting’s basic unwritten rules: Don’t let your child do poorly in school! Some of us blame ourselves for the problems or get really frustrated at our kids that they aren’t trying harder or doing better. Fundamentally, this goes back to not wanting to see them suffer and worrying about a future which doesn’t yet exist, in which we imagine them living below their potential. It can also feel embarrassing to see one’s child fall short of our expectations or what we imagine society’s expectations to be. This is one of those situations where we need to find a way to shelve the worry or shame and remember that the inherent nature of all children is to develop, learn, and grow. Once we can get our own worries out of the way, it frees us up to continue accompanying them on their path and supporting them in the best way we can.

Failure Is Not an Option

JUST BEFORE I BEGAN WRITING THIS CHAPTER, I READ ABOUT a thirty-nine-year-old man who body-slammed a thirteen-year-old boy at a county fair because the boy didn’t take his hat off during the national anthem. The man fractured the boy’s skull.78 The stats don’t lie, and the truth is our boys are getting angrier and angrier, and the instances of violence perpetrated by men are getting more frequent and intense. Misogyny is turned up to eleven on the dial on a daily basis, thanks to examples set by incumbent politicians; sexual assault is rampant in all industries, with multiple men accused of sexual harassment still occupying positions of power; and even Nazis are making a comeback, fueled mostly by angry white men in red hats.

To say we’re at a crucial crossroads for men and society is not an understatement.

But what can you do? You’re one person, right? In this maelstrom of toxicity, how can a single person combat these larger social problems that make you feel so hopeless and defeated? Well, if you’re the parent of a boy, I say you’re in an ideal position of power because you have the opportunity to do the number one most crucial thing on the planet to deal with this crap: you can raise a boy into a man committed to doing and being better.

PARENTING TIP #36: Be a fierce and relentless advocate for boys

I’m so sick of hearing myself have the same conversations over and over again with my boys. I feel like the worst kind of broken record, and the eyerolls and side-eye from my sons when I make them turn off the TV, put their phones and tablets down, and listen to me talk come out in full force. The chances they’re ignoring me or tuning me out seem high, and I wonder why I even bother (because aren’t kids programmed not to take their parents seriously?).

But then I overhear Will telling his friends that they shouldn’t use the word gay as an insult. I watch Sam slap on another coat of bright-red nail polish as he shows the world he gives less than zero fucks what anyone thinks of his choices. And Tommy, at age four, will openly rebuke anyone who uses the phrase like a girl with negative connotations. Our parental influence will ebb and flow, but you do have the ability to set a foundation for what’s good. The stage has been set and the script is written—now your kids just have to read it and act it out in the world. And that only happens when parents commit to raising boys differently.

It. Is. Exhausting. There’s no use pretending otherwise. Correcting the misinformation and harmful myths that find their way into our house from school and camp and even from friends and family feels like a full-time job. But these repeated conversations are how change happens. And in addition to instructing your kids, it is also extremely important to model thoughts and behaviors that you want your kids to emulate. It took me a long time to openly admit to my kids that their dad needed to see a professional to seek emotional help because he felt sad. It still makes me anxious and incredibly uncomfortable to say this. But if I don’t have honest conversations with my kids in which I’m vulnerable, I can’t expect them to reciprocate. I can’t risk helping to perpetuate the stereotype of another generation of angry men who don’t seek help when they need it because they don’t know how to deal with the burden society has laid on them. I can’t bear the thought of my kids not being free to be themselves simply because toxic masculinity forbids it.

Would you want to order from one tiny section of a restaurant menu or listen to just one radio station for the rest of your life? Of course not (well, I hope not). But that’s how limiting toxic masculinity is for boys. If you don’t show them what’s available or expose them to different viewpoints and diversity of all kinds, they’re much less apt to seek it out and experience it for themselves. Our boys need and deserve to experience the full range of human emotions, not just rage, aggression, violence, and hypermasculinity. They need to know that despite societal opinions to the contrary, they are not limited to bullshit gender roles and rigidly structured ways of thinking. They need to see men cry and talk about their feelings. They need to know men are still men if they paint their fingernails or decide to stay at home with their kids full-time or seek help from a therapist because life circumstances proved too much to bear on their own.

If you as parents don’t show them these truths, boys will fall into the lanes society assigns them as males. That’s what is at the heart of this issue, and what we have to change. We don’t need to vilify the good parts of masculinity, but we do need to differentiate the good from a toxic culture. Strength is an asset, but force is often toxic. Protecting your kids is noble, but overprotectiveness to the point of discrimination and violence is toxic. Providing for your family is essential, but thinking that only applies to money and being a breadwinner? Toxic.

The changes we need to make may seem monumental and too numerous to count, but they’re actually a series of small decisions that add up to a societal sea change. And not to sound alarmist, but we’re at a crossroads where the decisions we make from here on after will affect the paths we take. Men are killing themselves and each other at a sickening rate, and those who choose not to go down that route are being punished by one another and society for seeking the help they need. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy and a nonsensical downward spiral that we can only stop as parents vowing to raise their kids for a better future. It’s not a matter of political correctness, and it shouldn’t be a matter of left versus right—it’s just the right thing to do for the future generation. Giving boys agency to step out of the insidious box we unfairly put them in is necessary if we’re going to change things for the better.

I believe it’s possible, and I’ve seen it work on a small scale. In the spirit of men asking for help when they need it, I’m beseeching every parent of every boy out there to consider small changes that have an outsized impact on society.

Our boys’ lives literally depend on it.

Part 3 : It’s Time to Get Controversial

Rape culture is the normalization of violence against women as reflected in our cultural norms. It’s the glamorization of sexual violence against women in pop culture; it is the dehumanization of women in the media. Rape culture lives on today, not just in our politics but also among our children—in the playground, at the dinner table with their parents, in front of the TV. Luckily, there is a solution. Our boys need to be brought up from a young age to respect women. To believe them. To be their allies at school and eventually at work. I tell my boys it is not enough for them to simply be men who don’t mistreat women; they should strive to be men who also advocate for women. Who stand beside women even when it doesn’t directly and personally benefit them in any way. And to recognize the rape culture in which we live and fight against from the inside, because women aren’t going to fix this alone and this is truly a shared fight. This garbage only ends when men make a serious effort to get involved and be allies. That’s a message we need to instill in our boys as early as possible.

PARENTING TIP #30: The problem with porn and hookup culture

I saw my first Playboy when I was still in grade school. Another boy had smuggled it into the Protestant church I was forced to attend as a young kid. He showed me the centerfold in the church basement where we usually hung out to skip Sunday School. A few years later when I was in the eighth or ninth grade, my dad showed me what he thought was my first Playboy during an entirely uncomfortable rite-of-passage-moment, which resulted in me pretending that I hadn’t already combed through stacks of those magazines and memorized each Playmate of the Month. That was also the year I discovered softcore porn on Cinemax (or, as we called it, Skin-emax) and spent far too many hours sneaking downstairs during sleepovers at my house to watch poorly acted skin flicks with my friends.

Today, those days in the nineties are thought of as wholesome, nostalgic moments, because now, there’s Pornhub.

Instead of the rare instances in my youth when I could actually get my hands on a VHS porn cassette, Pornhub has been providing free, unadulterated porn clips to anyone with an internet connection since 2007. The widespread availability of just about every kind of porn you could ever imagine, all searchable in different categories, makes imparting a realistic view of sex to our boys very difficult. A December 2018 Esquire article by Sarah Rense found that in 2018, people made a grand total of 33.5 billion visits to Pornhub, representing 92 million daily average visits to the site and nearly 4.8 million pornographic videos uploaded—enough hours for a single person to continuously watch porn without breaks for more than a century.”65 So, little Johnny, who you think is an angel and who you’re sure would never watch smut? He’s watching. He’s watching a lot of it.

If you need proof, Peggy Orenstein’s book Boys & Sex has it— in all its brutal honesty. She interviewed more than a hundred boys between the ages of sixteen and twenty-two who are either college-bound or in college, and most of them use Pornhub constantly. When they wake up in the morning, Pornhub. If they have ten minutes to spare in between classes, Pornhub. One college junior she interviewed said it’s so reflexive he’ll often find himself calling up Pornhub on his phone when he meant to check the weather or the news. A college sophomore in the book said Pornhub’s launch coincided with him hitting puberty, which meant everything he learned about sex and masturbation was tied directly to Pornhub.66 Boy after boy in her book admitted to watching untold hours of porn, many of them progressing from innocent searches to more hardcore pornography until they were viewing things such as women defecating in hotdog buns.

As absurd as it sounds, this is the baseline expectation for many, many men when it comes to how their sexual experiences should unfold. One survey of 2,500 college students found that 60 percent of respondents use porn to learn crucial information about sex.67 With Orenstein’s research of talking with boys, which directly backs up that sobering statistic, the fact of the matter is that Pornhub is acting as a sex educator for a majority of young kids, simply because their parents are uncomfortable with having the birds and the bees talk. As a parent, that should scare you. Actually, that should terrify you to your core. Because even if you tell boys to respect women and get consent, what they’re hearing from you and what they’re seeing on the internet are two very different (and conflicting) things.

While there is certainly feminist porn and ethical porn being made, that is generally not the kind of porn most kids are watching on Pornhub and across the internet. I went to Pornhub.com, and here were the videos that popped up just from going to the homepage: “Therapist Cures Your Anxiety,” “Fucking My Auntie’s Face As My Stepuncle Walks in And Catches Us,” “Petite College Freshman Moans Daddy While Fucked Doggy,” and “No Mercy Anal Compilation—Tight Teens | Relentless Rough Fucking | Painal.” The common theme in all of these videos is well-endowed men treating women like blow-up dolls with pulses, their fake and unconvincing moans silenced when men haphazardly jam their veiny third legs down their throats. Absurd? Yes. To be fair, even seventy-five percent of those 2,500 college students surveyed cited unrealistic expectations in the porn they watch. But, and this is the key, they’re watching it anyway and internalizing what they see, because in the absence of proper sex education and honest conversations with parents, Pornhub fills the void.

So, what are kids internalizing when they watch porn? Orenstein’s book finds that while heterosexual males who watch porn are more likely to be accepting of same-sex marriage, they’re less likely to support affirmative action for women and to only tepidly endorse gender equality as it relates to work, politics, and life. Also, college students who regularly consume porn are more likely to consider what’s being portrayed as real, become sexually active sooner, have more partners, have higher rates of pregnancy, and experience more sexual aggression. And if you stop and think about it, it makes total sense. When watching porn, boys are bombarded by images that tell them they have to have ridiculously gargantuan penises and stamina that lasts for hours, and that women exist in the sexual realm solely as props to please them. The default in most heterosexual porn is rough sex that includes forcing a woman’s head down to gag on an erect penis or rough sex (often anal) that takes place without a condom and with little to no communication between partners.

Look, I’m not going to go all anti-porn on you (I still watch porn occasionally, and sometimes with my wife on the rare occasion that we have the house to ourselves). Curiosity about sex is natural and to be encouraged, and I think some kinds of porn when consumed responsibly and in moderation are generally okay, provided that parents properly communicate with boys the realities of sex, outside of the porn industry. The latter is what’s missing most of the time because parents aren’t letting kids know that most of what they see in porn is not normal, healthy, or realistic. It’s why we have a generation of confused boys who grow into men who are shocked when they try to get intimate with women for the first time and find that those women don’t appreciate any of the nonsense they’ve seen acted out their whole lives. It also leads to boys assuming this rough and non-communicative sex is what women want, which has a higher likelihood of ending in sexual assault if boys are forcing a woman’s head down to their crotch without asking.

Parents, don’t assume your boys know not to do that. Orenstein’s book has some devastating examples of nice guys engaging in extraordinarily problematic sexual acts with girls without the slightest recognition of a problem. Even outside of porn, hook-up culture for many teens is all about status and the number of partners you can get up to, and too many boys are only thinking of how to get that number higher so they can gain credibility with their (usually male) peers. Is she into it? Is she enjoying herself? Did she say she liked it? These are not questions boys are taught to ask—either by watching porn or from talks with their parents. Sure, if they step back and gain some perspective, they’re usually able to see the problem. But if no one has told them otherwise and they’re inundated by a deluge of porn telling them women love it when guys absentmindedly orgasm all over their faces? Well, is it any wonder why the #MeToo movement exists and why there are so many stories about sexual assault?

Boys are taking what they learn from porn and applying it in the real world despite there not being much reality in those videos whatsoever. That mindset not only has negative repercussions in the bedroom, it also further perpetuates the stereotype of women being seen merely as holes to be plugged and unimportant props that exist solely for the benefit of men. This impacts how boys view and treat girls outside of the context of sex as well. Not to mention the damage this does to girls. Girls who watch porn and think they need to take an inherently passive role and be sexually demeaned in order to keep men happy are also put at a devastating disadvantage; after all, porn teaches them to prioritize a man’s needs and desires above their own.

I was going to wait to talk to my son about porn, but after reading Orenstein’s book, I changed my mind and spoke with him immediately. It was awkward, no ifs, ands, or buts about it. But it was also extremely necessary, because as it turns out, at just eleven years old, he was already past due for that chat. And while I’m certainly not going to tell him to watch porn or send him a selection of my favorites, I’m also not going to pretend it doesn’t exist or harbor any delusions that he’s not going to watch it. Despite all the filters and safeguards I have on his phone and our computers, kids will find a way. They always have and always will. Just like I don’t believe abstinence is a realistic solution to teen pregnancy, I also know that shouting, “NO PORN!” isn’t going to work, either. I’m explaining to him that these are actors engaging in fantasy, and that even though they’re paid most of the time, most of them are not making much and are sometimes doing it in dangerous conditions. I’m telling him in no uncertain terms that porn is fake and that when he does eventually find himself in a sexual situation with a girl (he’s identified himself as heterosexual), he doesn’t have to guess at what she likes—he should just ask her and find out straight from the source. I also urge parents to check out amaze.org, which has content that, as they market it, “takes the awkward out of sex ed” by sticking to the “More Info. Less Weird.” mantra.

As one of Orenstein’s subjects says, kids want their parents to talk to them about sex and porn. They might cringe, but boys are not only looking for that information, they’re looking to their fathers for personal advice and anecdotes. They want to hear about what works, what’s healthy, and what they found regrettable. Yes, that’s going to be super uncomfortable, and it might feel like a root canal is a preferable way to spend the hour, but it’s worth it. I promise.

If you take anything away from this book, I hope it’s remembering that if you don’t talk to your boys about porn and sex, then Pornhub and the internet will be their default sex-ed instructor. And as we’ve seen, that’s unacceptable.

PARENTING TIP #31: Don’t fear the #MeToo movement; learn from it

The #MeToo movement, which has held many high-profile men accountable for rape and sexual assault during the past few years, is often erroneously seen as an attack on men. While some men have looked inward and taken note of the fact that one in three women experience sexual violence while nearly one in five women experience completed or attempted rape during their lifetimes at the hands of men,68 others have dismissed #MeToo as nothing more than gender propaganda fueled by social justice warriors. Instead of listening to victim accounts and engaging in self-reflection to see how their past actions may have contributed to the toxic culture that dismisses victims while protecting perpetrators, their only actions have been doubling down on the angst aimed at women and engaging in acts of self-preservation.

For instance, there is a belief among many evangelical men called the “Billy Graham Rule,” named after the famed preacher, where men of faith decide not to spend any time alone with women who are not their wives. The original idea is to limit the temptation to be unfaithful, but lately, this line of thinking has come into vogue again for slightly different reasons. Today, we have named it the “Mike Pence Rule” because Vice President Pence refuses to be alone with anyone other than “Mother” (which is the not-at-all creepy way he references his wife). Likewise, Mississippi gubernatorial candidate Robert Foster made headlines in the summer of 2019 for invoking the Billy Graham Rule when he denied a female journalist the opportunity to shadow him for a day on the campaign trail unless she brought another male colleague with her. While many people saw this as outright discrimination against a professional female journalist simply trying to do her job—a job Foster allows men to do with no problems—Foster maintained his actions protect him not only against any potential infidelity, but also against the current #MeToo movement and any allegations of impropriety from women.

The problem here is indicative of preexisting gender bias being taken to an extreme and going sideways. The desire to remain loyal to one’s partner is a good one at its core, but it’s bullshit when it gets to the point of disallowing yourself or your spouse to ever interact on a one-on-one basis with a member of the opposite sex. I have female friends and my wife has male friends. Sometimes we hang out with those friends alone. Why? Because I trust my wife, and she trusts me. Honestly, if you’re in a marriage that can’t withstand a solo dinner with a colleague or a catch-up with a friend who happens to be of the opposite sex, then that marriage is already in extraordinarily peril. What a horrible message we’d be sending to our boys as parents if they hear one parent tell the other that they’re “not allowed” to hang out with a friend of the opposite sex because of distrust and fragile egos. Again, as we’ve discussed, this assumes men are untamed animals who operate solely by their id and can’t be trusted without fear of whipping out their erections, while women are all just jezebels out to steal a man. It also flies in the face of the mutual trust and commitment that should be the foundation of a marriage. It shouldn’t take a sexist rule to ensure fidelity in a marriage, and frankly, it’s a form of abusive control to forbid your spouse from hanging out with a friend just because you’re not secure.

Unfortunately, Pence and Foster are hardly the only men adopting this antiquated mindset, and it isn’t just a problem in the home. According to a 2019 survey from LeanIn.org, 60 percent of male managers in America are uncomfortable participating in a common work activity with a woman, such as mentoring, working alone, or socializing together.69 That represents a 32 percent increase from just one year ago. Men who hold senior positions are twelve times more likely to avoid one-on-one meetings with female junior colleagues, nine times more likely to hesitate to travel together for work, and six times more likely to hesitate to go to work dinners with women as opposed to male coworkers. Why is this phenomenon suddenly occurring? 36 percent of American men surveyed reported being uncomfortable with how it would look being alone with a female coworker. Today, the Billy Graham Rule is occurring in workplaces all over America, and it is extraordinarily damaging to everyone.

For example, I’m overweight, but I know the answer to my obesity is not locking myself away in solitary confinement and avoiding all foods forever. The solution is to learn how to make more informed nutritional decisions so I can be healthier. One of my sons used to be completely petrified of elevators, but while avoiding them and taking the stairs might do wonders for his cardio, it’s not a realistic solution for him to avoid elevators for all of eternity. So, we taught him how elevators work and gave him the confidence to eventually use them with less and less unease every time.

So, it stands to reason that the solution for men at work who are wary of spending time with women colleagues—because they don’t want to be “#MeToo”-ed or accused of anything untoward— isn’t to lock themselves away and ignore half the population. It’s simply to—wait for it—not sexually harass their female coworkers!

Another example of fairly routine preexisting gender biases turning into something harmful is the Men’s Rights Activist (MRA) movement. For the blessedly uninitiated, MRAs are a group of wildly off-kilter gentlemen who believe it isn’t women, but rather men, who are discriminated against in society, namely because men are obligated to sign up for the military draft at eighteen, men work the majority of backbreaking industrial and manufacturing jobs, men are victims of domestic abuse at the hands of women, and men primarily get screwed over in divorces involving custody battles and alimony. The thing is, they’re not totally wrong about the last two points, which is what makes the vitriol and hate so frustrating and disturbing. MRAs have some legitimate points, but those points get lost in an avalanche of anti-feminist, anti-equality, and often violently misogynistic fury that negates any and all sense they had in the first place, such as their belief that feminist women gatekeep their vaginas unfairly. For MRAs, everything that doesn’t go right in their lives is the fault of women.

I’ve run into these guys on social media a few times, and their mindset is terrifying. It’s all alpha male, anti-woman nonsense fueled by anger and entitlement. They are known to go after prominent feminists online with unbelievably degrading insults and even violent rape fantasies, as described in Katie J. M. Baker’s 2013 Jezebel piece titled “Rape and Death Threats: What Men’s Rights Activists Really Look Like.” In that piece, Baker describes how a feminist named Charlotte who protested at an MRA speech paid the price via online harassment after the fact. “They’ve circulated her personal info, dredged up details about her past (one fellow told Charlotte that her dog who died years ago would be ‘disappointed’ in her), and sent her messages threatening to rape and kill and rape her again—one of the more PG-rated ones promises that ‘we will not rest until your unholy blood is shed.’”70 This male ugliness came out again in full force during the 2016 election as the nation faced the very real possibility of its first female president in Hillary Clinton, and I’ll go to my grave believing that it helped fuel a misogynist’s rise to the office in Donald Trump.

The irony in all of this is that MRAs claim they do what they do to lower suicide rates among men, create more fairness in the family court system, and generally advocate more for boys and men. But in reality, I believe they’re simply looking to silence women by strengthening the negative societal forces that brought us the patriarchy in the first place. MRAs, Billy Graham rule enthusiasts, incels—these groups didn’t just magically appear out of the ether. They are the inevitable outcome of gender biases that take hold when our young boys are subject to things like pornography that degrades women, media messaging that reinforces patriarchal values, and failure of parents to talk with boys about gender bias and toxic masculinity.

Our boys need to know that you don’t build yourself up by tearing other people down, and that this amount of anger, resentment, and violence isn’t going to help anyone. If your version of “helping” involves name-calling and wishing someone gets raped or has a cock put in their mouth to shut her up, you’re on the wrong side of the fence. Unfortunately, changing an adult male MRA’s mind is a Herculean if not impossible task, so it’s incumbent on parents to give boys the foundation they need when they’re still young to value equality of all kinds. Teach boys that women don’t owe them anything as far as sex is concerned, and that while unfairness and bias does exist for us all, the simple fact is it’s much more advantageous to be a white, straight male in America than it is to be a woman (or a person of color or a member of the LGBTQ+, etc.). And once your children are equipped with this knowledge, teach them to advance society in such a way where there will be more understanding, more dialogue, and more acceptance.

The answer isn’t taking on an Us vs. Them mentality, isolation, or fear of repercussions; it’s even more integration, communication, and self-education. It’s not that difficult to be a good and respectful human being. I don’t care whether it’s women, gay people, people of color, or trans folks—my boys need more interaction with a wider variety of people, not less. I want them to know that an incalculable amount of knowledge can learned by engaging with other people who don’t look like they do. I also want their relationships to be based on trust, not fear. The Billy Graham Rule only serves to further divide us and throw up walls, and holy shit do we have enough talk of walls lately.

PARENTING TIP #32: Don’t spank your kids

I wasn’t spanked often growing up, and I was never hit with a belt or a switch. But, like most kids I knew, the threat always loomed. If I was spanked, it only happened when I was little, for fighting with my brother, trying to run into the street, and one time for swearing. As a kid, being spanked by my parents felt like I was getting into the ring with Mike Tyson, but in reality, it was simply a swat on the backside that hurt more emotionally than physically. So, when I became a parent, I took spanking and put it in my toolbox of parenting techniques to use when necessary, since “I was spanked and I turned out fine.”

With my oldest son, it worked. I can count on one hand the number of times we had to spank him, and each time we did, it had the desired effect. Once, as a toddler, he was standing in the dog’s water bowl and trying to pry the protective covers off the electrical outlet. When I looked up, fears of electrocution flooded my mind as I rushed over to yank him out and then popped him on the butt before I could even think about it because I was so scared. He never did it again, and I continued to look at spanking as an effective weapon in my arsenal of parenting techniques.

I recounted that story in an online parenting group I was part of at the time and was surprised by the disapproving responses. Then, other parents started linking to peer-reviewed research that showed, in no uncertain terms, that spanking was unequivocally bad for kids.

According to a piece by the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2012, “many studies have shown that physical punishment—including spanking, hitting, and other means of causing pain—can lead to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury, and mental health problems for children.” In the piece, Alan Kazdin, PhD, a director of the Child Conduct Clinic at the Yale University Parenting Center, said, “Spanking doesn’t work. You cannot punish out these behaviors that you do not want. There is no need for corporal punishment based on the research. We are not giving up an effective technique. We are saying this is a horrible thing that does not work.”71 In the same article, Sandra Graham-Bermann, PhD, psychology professor and principal investigator for the Child Violence and Trauma Laboratory at the University of Michigan, said that while physical punishment can work at temporarily stopping problematic behavior via instilling fear in the child of being hit in the moment, it doesn’t carry into the long-term. And in many cases, it makes kids even more aggressive. Furthermore, the United Nations Committee on the Human Rights of the Child issued a directive in 2006 calling physical punishment “legalized violence against children” that should be eliminated in all settings.72

I read these studies, and I saw these recommendations, and I heard the experts extolling the virtues of finding other punishments outside of spanking. Yet I refused to eliminate it from my child discipline repertoire because 1) I truly didn’t think it was harmful; 2) I thought kids who aren’t spanked get spoiled and bratty; and 3) it worked with Will, so what did these “experts” really know?

Then came Sam, our second child.

Sam misbehaved from the get-go. Classic middle child. He had none of my oldest son’s composed and contemplative nature, but he made up for that in curiosity, impetuousness, and temper. Sam did everything he wasn’t supposed to, and we tried everything we normally would have before going to the extreme step of spanking—redirection, positive reinforcement, distraction, bribery, timeouts; you name it, we tried it. But nothing worked. One day, after Sam repeatedly pulled our dog’s fur, grabbed his paws, and tried to ride him for the thousandth time, I warned him that if he didn’t stop, he was going to be spanked. When he kept going, I followed through on my threat. I’ll never forget, until the day I die, what happened next. He looked at me, wide-eyed in surprise, without a hint of fear, and said, “No hurt!” Then he went right back to torturing the dog, but this time with more gusto. As time went on, I mistakenly thought that I just needed to be firmer and escalate the situation. I threatened to smack his butt harder until it did hurt, except he was digging in as well and acting out even worse than before. If anything, I realized that the spanking just made him more aggressive and entrenched. With Will, it was one spank and he was good, but Sam? Sam was an entirely different beast. That was the first time I learned what should have been an obvious lesson—that you can’t parent your kids the same way because they’re all different.

When I noticed Sam trying to spank his brothers and sometimes his friends soon after, I realized his default responses to stimuli were all turning physical and rough. Then came the ADHD and ODD diagnoses and a laundry list of questions from doctors about how we were raising him and, yes, whether or not we spanked him. I sheepishly answered in the affirmative and proceeded to get lectured on why that’s not a good idea. Of course, I already knew the reasons why—because I had read and ignored them based on my own upbringing and the toxic masculinity bullshit I was still buying into, even though I always tried so hard to overcome it. I had been duped into believing I wasn’t a real dad unless I smacked my kid around to stop him from becoming a spoiled brat.

Thinking about how ridiculous my actions were still brings a tear to my eye. There I was, fully aware that boys are thrown into a world of physical brutality and aggression, and somehow I thought adding to that via spanking was different. Better. That it would magically be exempt from all the other forms of violence young boys are exposed to. Sam is proof that aggression breeds aggression and that kids don’t benefit when the people they’re supposed to trust most in the world choose to hit them. I naively thought that if I smacked him on the butt with an open hand and not on the face or body with a closed fist, I was okay and not part of the problem. When I take a step back to really think about that “logic” for a second, it boggles my mind. Yet I know full well I’m not alone and that millions of well-meaning parents think nothing of spanking their kid and even consider it responsible parenting.

Here’s the real test. If you walk out of your house and whack the first person you see on the street on the ass, what do you think will happen? Spoiler alert—the police will be called and you will likely be arrested for assault, even if that person was being loud and obnoxious. It doesn’t matter—you hit someone, you pay the price. If smacking a stranger is a criminal offense, why the hell is smacking your kid any different? The answer is it’s not.

In a world that sees our boys resort to violence as a default setting for just about everything, spanking unnecessarily adds to the stew of toxic masculinity in a way I don’t want to be a part of anymore. We’ve never spanked our youngest, and I’ll never spank any of my kids again. I actually went up to each of my two oldest sons to apologize—I told them that I had been wrong and that it would never happen again. Men are not infallible, nor should their authority be beyond reproach. If you’ve wronged someone, you need to own up and apologize, and I hope to model that behavior for my kids.

I won’t sit here and tell you I’ve found the answer to my child discipline problems, because I haven’t. I try reward charts, timeouts, physical labor, positive reinforcement, redirection, taking things away, and everything else every expert has recommended. Does it work? Sometimes. When it doesn’t, I try something else. But I will no longer hit my kids, and I’m sorry I ever thought that was a good idea. If you’re still a proponent of corporal punishment, I hope you reconsider. Your kids might still misbehave, but at least you won’t be joining them in the process.

PARENTING TIP #33: The problem with chivalry

When I started frequenting feminist circles to expand my perspective on things, the topic of chivalry was a major roadblock and an embarrassing stumbling point for me.

Chivalry was originally a code by which medieval knights were supposed to conduct themselves gallantly, and, like a lot of men I know, I was raised to believe in it and apply it to my dating life. Open the car door, pull out her chair at dinner, always pay for said dinner, put your hand on her lower back as you introduce her into the room first, walk her to her door, hold open doors in public, and walk closest to the street when you’re both walking side-by-side—these were the things I had been taught were non-negotiable. I never gave it a second thought, because why would I? They seemed like good things. Kind things. Noble things. Many men, myself included, are brought up to believe chivalry is as necessary as basic good manners, like “please” and “thank you.” And why the hell would anyone possibly be against good manners?

I even went so far as to pen a truly unfortunate guest column in August 2011 at the Good Men Project, sticking up for chivalry and lambasting the people I saw as attacking good manners. Reading it now makes me cringe. Looking back on how little I knew and realizing how wrong I was is painful beyond words. I hate that my ignorant blathering still floats around on the internet, but that’s part of my journey. To embrace it, here’s a little snippet of my idiocy: “If the biggest problem you have with men is that they randomly hold open doors or help you carry heavy groceries to your car, I really don’t want to hear it. In the words of Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men, ‘I’d rather you just say thank you and go on your way.’ . . . As someone who routinely holds open doors and gives up his seat on subways to women (and some men) without any expectations whatsoever, I have to request we put a stop to this idiocy. Common courtesy is a good thing. Manners are a good thing. Let’s keep it that way.”73

I was soon taken to task for those views. At first, it was really hard to hear the criticisms, and frankly, I was confused as I truly had no understanding of how anyone could be against chivalrous actions. But after poring over response after response, largely saying the same things, I knew where I had gone wrong.

The problem with chivalry is rooted in the topic of “gendered civility”—that the chivalrous person is being polite solely and specifically to women, and usually because they hope to gain something from the transaction. The people who had commented on my article pointed out that many women do feel infantilized at the automatic assumption that they need men to walk them to their cars or pull open doors for them, as if they lack the strength or agency. They also pointed out that I was foisting my own patriarchal values on them, even if they didn’t want or ask for chivalry. Finally, the knockout blow came when someone in an online discussion asked me if I fancied myself a gentleman, to which I answered yes, and then she proceeded to ask me how it was gentlemanly to forbid a woman from paying for a dinner or opening her own door even if she expressed her desire to do so. Chivalry, if unwelcome, completely ignores a woman’s perspective and wishes.

At the end of the day, I explain to my boys that all we’re really talking about here is kindness and civility—the sex of the recipient shouldn’t be an issue at all. Holding a door open for someone is still a good thing, as long as I’m holding it open for any man, woman, or child and not doing it based solely on the other person’s gender and my assumptions about what they need. Paying for dinner is usually appreciated, as long as the person I’m trying to treat is on board with it. And if someone is nervous about walking back to her car or back home late at night, ask if she’d like you to accompany her. If the answer is yes, great. If it is no, don’t force your knightly code on her because all you’re doing is taking away her agency, after she’s told you that’s not what she wants.

But make no mistake, I’m not advocating for a world without manners or kindnesses. And I’m certainly not saying that women want to do everything themselves or that they don’t appreciate help. That’s not the case at all. But as boys and men, we have to be aware if our chivalrous intentions come with an expectation of reciprocity, which may force women into a position that makes them uncomfortable. Some men may complain that they’re damned if they do and damned if they don’t—that was the title of my piece on the Good Men Project . . . so I’m talking about 2011 me—but those men haven’t yet realized that they don’t need to choose between being a gentleman and being an asshole. There’s a whole lot of in-between to be found.

Parents need to remind boys that being nice is its own reward, and that niceness and kind gestures are not a reward card that ends with benefits if they get enough points. Raise kids to be considerate because that’s the right way to act, not for a reward, especially if the reward is sex. Remember, boys need to hear they are not owed sex from women as much as possible, no matter how many dinner tabs they pick up, doors they open, or jackets they give up to keep another person warm. Gendered politeness is not really polite at all, and communication, as always, is key. If a woman really wants to pay for her own drink or meal, then teach boys to respect her wish just as they would if a person of the same sex asked to split the bill. When in doubt, kids can never go wrong listening to and respecting the wishes of other people, so try to make that the default setting for boys.

PARENTING TIP #34: Let boys know it’s not all about the money

I have always struggled with my attitude toward money, as well as the concept I have that it is tied to my masculinity. It’s been a deeply problematic issue to the point of negatively impacting my marriage, and just before writing this chapter, it popped up again, this time in my children.

Growing up, I always knew my dad was obsessed with money, mainly because he spent most of his childhood being raised by a single mom, and they didn’t always have much. He always swore that when he had kids, he’d make damn sure that they wouldn’t want for anything. For the most part, he delivered on that promise. When my parents had me in their early twenties, neither of them had a college degree. My mom managed a McDonald’s when I was a baby, and my dad helped start a stainless-steel business that he still works at to this day as vice president. We lived in a ramshackle house for the first ten years of my life, and I barely remember seeing my dad because he was always at work, building a business with his partner from scratch. When he wasn’t working, he was serving various roles as an elected and appointed official for our small Massachusetts town. Even from a very young age, I knew he was tortured by the knowledge that he was missing our childhood. He missed the moment I hit my first over-the-fence homerun in Little League, so we drove over to Town Hall where he was serving as a Selectman after the game, and I caught his attention mid-meeting and mouthed homerun, at which point he jumped out of his chair to come over and give me a tearful hug. He’d constantly apologize to us for not being around, but the reasons were there was a mortgage to pay, mouths to feed, and clothes to buy.

When we moved into a new, bigger house, my dad was so proud and happy. We had two-and-a-half bedrooms, and my brother and I no longer had to sleep in the same room. We had an actual shower, when before we’d only had a bath. I also remember that he bought a 50-inch big-screen TV to mark the occasion, and it was the very first thing to enter the new house (even before us). I knew that in his mind, he had made it. He had accomplished what every breadwinner strives for—a proper home for his family to grow up in. The only problem was a bigger house equaled a bigger mortgage payment, and my dad had to work even harder while my mom did her best Superwoman impression as the world’s most involved stay-at-home parent.

I’ll never forget the camping trip our family took when I was in high school and getting ready for college. My dad sat me down and had a talk with me that I wouldn’t fully understand until much later in life. He opened up about all the stress he felt as a provider, all the plates he had to keep spinning in the air and the masters he had to serve. He tearfully spoke about the sacrifice men like him had to make and all the time he had missed watching us grow up in order to make sure we’d have the things we needed. And he jokingly lamented the fact that just as I was becoming interesting and fun to be around, I would soon be leaving for college. While Teenage Me couldn’t fully grasp his message, Adult Me now understands his pain all too well and has felt those same moments of loss and helplessness.

When I first met MJ, I was working as a sales representative at my dad’s business making peanuts; she, on the other hand, was a rock-star manager for Bank of America, and damn did she make bank! She was a top-performer in the top 1 percent of managers and earned trips to the Bahamas, as well as fat bonuses. Her salary was more than double mine—and that, ridiculously, was a problem for me.

My friends referred to MJ as my “sugar mama.” The men in my life smiled and asked if I received an allowance from her. They openly questioned why someone as beautiful and successful as MJ would choose to be with me, especially since I wasn’t bringing home a fat paycheck. On the outside, I rolled with the punches and embraced the teasing, jokingly referring to myself as a “kept man” and telling my friends who wanted to go out that I had to “check with the boss.” Hell, I even managed to convince myself that I had become a progressive, modern man who was just fine with his wife making more money and being more successful than me. I performed a rousing “fake it till you make it” performance to convince myself and everyone around me that I was fine with the situation.

But when the recession hit in 2007 to 2008, MJ lost her job. Even though she got a new one, it wasn’t at the same level. Then she got sick and couldn’t work, and suddenly money was very much an issue. I was a newspaper reporter at the time, making even less money than I had been making as a sales rep, so I began looking for a new job. When I found one as a content manager for a company near Boston and discovered the salary would be double what I was making at the newspaper, my heart nearly leapt out of my chest. I was ecstatic. But my happiness wasn’t an “oh my God we can finally start paying our bills on time and MJ won’t have to go back to work so she can focus on getting healthier and we can survive as a family unit” type of happy. Instead, I felt a decided and intense emotion that screamed, “Thank fucking God I finally make more money than my wife; I’m a real man now! ”

I hated that I felt that way, even in that moment. It was dickish, stupid, and completely backward. I feel shame just writing it down on these pages. But it’s the truth, and I have to own it. I was feeling a primal, Neanderthal-level urge to unfurl my manhood on the table next to my paycheck. Even though I now hate the idea of a “Man Card,” at that moment I wished someone had been there to give me mine. I felt like, at any moment, all of my male relatives, dead and alive, were going to come out of a room filled with cigar smoke, with firm handshakes and bourbon, while clapping me on the back and welcoming me to the club. All that posturing I had done telling people I was cool with a wife who out-earned me? Garbage. I had been lying to myself, and the second I made more money than her, I was relieved in a way that both perplexed and disturbed me.

I don’t want this feeling to ever strike my boys. Or any boy. That kind of pressure is toxic, and it will ultimately manifest itself in a negative way. My wife is truly proud of me and all of my accomplishments, but she felt that way even when I was a thirty-two-year-old print journalist making $34,000 a year despite having a decade of experience. Meanwhile, even though I was proud of her and all her accomplishments, it wasn’t pure or wholehearted. Despite putting on my best act, it’s clear I was also very jealous of her success. When she was let go and had to take another banking job for less money, a part of me was actually happy, because I felt it got us a little closer to being even. Just think for a second how fucked up it is that a small part of me rejoiced even though my family had less money to stay afloat, simply because my fragile male ego couldn’t take being out-earned by a woman. Not only is that anger-inducing, it’s also pathetic. A partner who can’t be happy for his significant other’s success is a pretty shitty partner, and I’ve spent a lot of time since that realization trying to make it up to her.

Whoever my sons end up partnering with, I hope they fully support them without selfishness or shame. And whatever their financial state in life, I hope they feel proud of their successes without buying into the misconception that they have to earn enough money to be considered “a man.” I urge them to not only value their partners, but also themselves, regardless of how much their take-home pay is at the end of every week.

But I also want my boys to know that in some respects, salary absolutely matters. Namely when it comes to the gender wage gap.

According to PayScale’s report “The State of The Gender Pay Gap in 2019,” the uncontrolled gender pay gap sees women making only $0.79 for every dollar men earn. But even when they examined the controlled gender pay gap—women and men with the same employment characteristics doing similar jobs—women still only earn $0.98 for every dollar earned by a man with the exact same qualifications.74 Men’s rights activists and misogynists everywhere will argue until the end of time that there is no gender wage gap and that women earn less because they take off big chunks of time to have kids, which is garbage reasoning. Women are paid less. End of story.

Never was that more glaring than during the 2019 World Cup, which saw the US Women’s National Team win its fourth title since 1991. The men? They have had just one quarterfinal appearance and three trips to the Round of 16 in that same time-span. Despite their winning ways, a lawsuit filed by US women’s players claims there were distinct differences related to the manner of compensation for the men as compared to the women for past performances at the World Cup. The women received $1.725 million for winning the 2015 event, according to the lawsuit, while the men received $5.375 million simply for reaching the Round of 16 in 2014. And while the women were galvanizing a nation and battling the best opposing players from around the globe, in addition to fending off attacks from their own president, the men didn’t even make the last World Cup held in Russia.

It’s vital for parents to talk openly and honestly with their kids, especially boys, about the existence of pay inequality for men and women because, with any luck, it will motivate boys to join the fight for equality. It can’t be stressed enough that women fighting these battles on their own is not ideal. Boys can and should know about these issues so they can grow up to become men who will help fight for equality in the workplace, at home, and in society in general—simply because it’s the right and fair thing to do.

PARENTING TIP #35: Reexamine your religion when bringing up kids

We’ve tackled politics and guns, so why not complete the trifecta of controversy and move right on to religion?

I grew up a non-Catholic in a very Catholic town and went on to marry a Catholic woman, and for the life of me I’ll never understand how so many wonderful people associate themselves with a religion that is clearly not intent on equality. Mary McAleese, former president of Ireland, said in a March 2018 British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) article that the Catholic Church is one of the last great bastions of misogyny,75 and you can’t really argue with her on that point. Can women be priests? Nope. Are women told by the Catholic Church that they’re going to hell for eternity if they maintain their own bodily autonomy and opt for an abortion? Yup. Does the Church look kindly on women taking contraception in order to avoid getting pregnant? Not one bit.

It is perplexing to me to have Catholic friends and know Catholic people and be married to a woman who still considers herself Catholic—good, decent people—who fight for equality and against misogyny every single day; yet you also find them adhering to a religion that clearly views women as “other” and therefore lesser. And although they try to excuse it to me by claiming their specific church is progressive, the fact remains that only men are allowed to hold power in the Church as priests and bishops and cardinals and popes. Men dictate what women should and shouldn’t do with their own bodies. And Catholic men spent decades covering for and enabling rampant sexual abuse by male clergy members—not only perpetrated on parishioners, but also nuns. It was only in 2019 that Pope Francis acknowledged the Catholic Church’s “persistent problem of sexual abuse of nuns by priests and even bishops,” according to a New York Times article by Jason Horowitz and Elizabeth Dias that was published on February 5.76

It’s not just Catholicism, of course. Many fundamentalist Christian sects don’t allow women to be ordained and evangelical Christian values like sexual purity and the submission of women to their husbands are considered sacrosanct. I guess that’s what happens when you base a faith off a woman fucking it up for all of us by snacking on fruit that she was tricked into eating by a talking snake. And whether it’s the Muslim faith (although widely misunderstood and exaggerated for political purposes by so many), which undoubtedly has issues with veiling, divorce laws, the young legal age for marriage, polygamy, and even honor killings in extreme instances, or the entrenched misogyny of orthodox Jewish people, the bottom line is that women aren’t treated well by many religions—all while men are simultaneously and undeservedly exalted. I’d ask parents to take a step back and simply ask themselves if their religion is an acceptable model or belief system to bring kids up in if they want to teach them to become respectable, functional members of society.

As you might’ve already guessed, I’m a heathen atheist.

I didn’t start off life that way. I’m the product of a Catholic father and a Protestant mother who was baptized and confirmed in a liberal Protestant Church after many years of Sunday School. Shit, I was even a church choir standout. In addition to my maternal grandmother being a member of the Boston Pops, Tanglewood, and a master concert pianist, she was also the church choir director. Which meant, whether I liked it or not, I was not only going to church every Sunday; I was also going to sing unto the Lord while there.

But it wasn’t long until a confluence of events began to make me question my religion in general.

For starters, biblical literalists have always confused me, because even from a young age, I could tell these were just stories and allegorical tales meant to prove a point. Except it was clear that not everyone felt that way, and I quickly learned that questioning the Word of God went over like a fart in church. Ultimately, it was discovering how other religions shut down women and rejected members of the LGBTQ+ community that put the nail in my believer coffin. Well, that and my intense love of sports, which saw practices and games coincide with church. I can’t tell you how many times I had a soccer or baseball or basketball uniform on under my choir robe, and I can still hear my grandmother scolding me for wearing cleats in church and ducking out early to get to my games.

I could also never get over the fact that so many people said they believed in a God who supposedly valued all human life as equal, but who would allow rampant discrimination and even hate to rule the day and the values of the Church. Even today, the official stance of the Catholic Church is that homosexuality is a sin and Pope Francis—by far the most liberal and progressive of popes—is against allowing women to enter the priesthood. I truly believe that you’re not helping the case for equality if you subscribe to a faith that treats people differently based on sex or sexual orientation; and if you give money and time to that organization, you’re enabling it. Even for those working to change the culture from the inside, I just can’t square participating in something I know to be problematic.

Which is why one of the biggest fights my wife and I have ever had was about our kids and religion.

Although all of my kids have been to various church services, none of my children are baptized—a fact that deeply disturbs some members of my family. MJ wanted to baptize them as babies, and I vehemently refused, for all the aforementioned reasons. I placed a priority on raising our boys to be free-thinkers who stand up against harmful societal norms and advocate for underrepresented minorities by pushing back against patriarchal and discriminatory institutions, and I saw no way I could voluntarily initiate them as members of an organization that I feel is among the worst offenders—especially when they are only babies who have no agency or choice of their own. I understand baptism doesn’t mean kids can’t ultimately change religions or have no religion at all, but I still viewed it as a commitment to the faith and an affiliation I was uncomfortable making.

We finally agreed that neither of us would “poison the well,” so to speak, by being overly preachy or biased when it comes to religion. We’ve allowed them to go with relatives or friends to Catholic and Protestant church services, and we’ve waited for them to ask questions and show interest. Right now, my oldest is in sixth grade, and he generally believes in God. He’s heard his mom’s view, he’s heard my view, and while he doesn’t know enough to commit to a religion, he’s a spiritual kid who simply believes in a higher power. And that’s fine. My six-year-old? Staunch atheist. I’m sure part of that is because of me, but he’s also a very literal kid who says that Bible stories sound fake and made up. This is an emotionally intelligent and cause-oriented kid whose Christmas present was to ask us to donate ten dollars a month in his name to an organization called Planting Peace, which owns the Equality House across the street from Westboro Baptist Church and is run by my friend Aaron Jackson, because of their work with the gay and trans community, as well as their efforts to deworm children in third world countries.

All of which rebuts a claim I’ve had leveled at me by many religious folks—that without God and religion, there is no path to goodness, no way to possibly understand right and wrong, good and bad. But I’m raising living proof that you don’t need organized religion to have a moral compass. Furthermore, I think being free of the constraints of existing discriminatory beliefs that are deeply entrenched and institutionalized will help parents who are raising children to start with a foundation that isn’t riddled with bigotry and intolerance.

I’m not writing this to convert anyone to being a nonbeliever (though that’s already happening no matter what I say: a 2015 Pew Research Center poll reported that 34 to 36 percent of millennials (those born after 1980) reported no religious affiliation, adding that this was a dramatic increase from 2007, when only 16 percent of Americans said they were affiliated with no religion77). My ask is that parents who are considering raising kids within an organized religion think very carefully about what messages they might be sending if they do so. Children are observant, and they will internalize anything, for example, if your religion tells you to “hate the sin” of same-sex attraction or bars women from serving in positions of power. So, either address it head on and explain why discrimination is wrong and that churches and religions aren’t perfect—or you can always hop on over to the heathen bandwagon.

Either way, it never hurts to step back and take an unbiased, holistic view of what you’re entering into with your kids. If they hear you preach equality and tolerance outside of church but see you heed a religion that discriminates against women or gay people, that’s a potentially harmful mixed message.

Part 2 : It’s Time to Get Controversial

Bushmaster took things a step further by creating the Man Card Online promotion, which consisted of an online quiz in which test-takers were asked a series of complex and Mensa-level questions meant to gauge their manhood and ultimately determine if they were truly worthy of possessing the much-sought-after Man Card. It was (so originally) called “The Man Test,” and the copy read as follows: “It’s game time, Sunshine. The simple man test that follows is all that stands between you and a return to man glory. Search your soul. Answer honestly. And let the truth decide your fate.” Men taking this test know upfront that Bushmaster isn’t messing around, because their “man glory” is at stake.

What are the questions, you ask? “Do you think tofu is an acceptable meat?” Holy shit. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t like tofu, either, but not because eating it chips away at my fragile male ego and renders me unworthy of man glory. God help you if you answered yes to that question, because real men wouldn’t be caught dead eating a healthier meat substitute that’s better for your long-term health instead of a raw, bloody cow (even though I think tofu tastes like sadness).

The next question is multiple choice: “A carload of rival fans deliberately cuts you off in traffic on the way to the championship game. What do you do?” Your choices are: “A: I slump down in my seat and change the music on the stereo, hoping the guys with me in my car don’t notice the slight. B: I start singing the fight song of my own team in a high, merry voice. C: I skip the game, find the other car in the parking lot, and render it unrecognizable with a conflagration of shoe polish and empty food containers. D: I ignore their rudeness, assuming it’s just a mistake, despite the team flags flying from my car windows.” There’s a lot to unpack in this one. As you might imagine, ignoring the unforgivable travesty of being cut off in traffic and calming down with music or turning the other cheek isn’t going to get you to Man Glory anytime soon. No sir. And singing the fight song—especially in a high, merry voice, which is feminine and therefore unacceptable—is no good, either. Clearly the only Man-Card-level solution is to go after the bastards and commit vandalism.

Let’s not forget this is a gun company that’s part of the gun industry with a goal of having as many people as possible own as many guns as possible in as many places as possible. And surely the fine folks at Bushmaster know road rage is a very real, very dangerous thing, especially where guns are involved. Yet, there they are, a gun company telling men that a real man would risk starting a confrontation with potentially armed parties all because they were cut off in traffic. That shit is flat-out disgusting and morally repugnant in every way. It’s also wildly irresponsible as it dares men to commit crimes.

I don’t have to tell you that it keeps going. “What of these best expresses your inner light?” The choices were between a very cute kitten, an AR-15, and a lovely votive candle. (Obviously you can’t pick the cat; the candle is slightly confusing because fire is wicked masculine, but it’s a clear fuck-no-bro to chick candles; the choice here is clear—nothing expresses a man’s inner light like the flashes from the muzzle when you’re shooting shit.) “You blow a tire on the highway. Do you know where to look for your jack and your spare?” Bushmaster might as well ask if you know where to look to find your balls, because if you answer no to this question, you won’t need them anyway. (This might be a good time to mention that I don’t know shit about cars; meanwhile, my wife embarrassed me on our first date when she successfully restarted her brother’s broken-down jeep when I panicked and misdiagnosed the problem as having to do with “an engine rotator splint” in hopes of impressing her. The good news is today, I’ve freed myself from the unnecessary shame and guilt that toxic masculinity demands men have when it comes to automotive repair knowledge—I give zero fucks that I don’t know a thing because I know my wife can handle it.)

Finally, if you “pass” Bushmaster’s Man Test, it reads, “You’ve redeemed your man priveleges [sic]” (because spelling is for wimps who haven’t mastered the intricacies of the AR-15). “Now prove it! Print, send or post your Man Card!” After all, you’re not truly a man until you’ve whipped it out and shown it to everyone, right? Also, just in case you needed an ignorant cherry on top of this toxic sundae, Bushmaster had a way for dudes to call for the revocation of someone else’s Man Card. It’s hard to believe the surely peer-reviewed and scientifically sound theory behind Bushmaster’s Man Test could possibly be wrong, but just in case, they allowed men to enter the information of other men whose manliness they wanted to call into question. Under the “What’s the problem?” field, men could choose from “Crybaby,” “Cupcake,” “Short Leash,” “Coward,” and “Just Unmanly.” In the next field, you could get into the specifics of why this man should be served a revocation notice: “Actually ordered an appletini with other men present”; “Does Pilates regularly”; “Has a dog so small it can fit in his wallet”; “Gets haircuts that cost more than eight bucks”; “Decries the eating of red meat while extolling the virtues of soy-based substitutes for pretty much everything else on Earth”; “Has a bumper sticker on his car complaining about ‘mean people’”; “Avoids eye contact with tough looking fifth-graders”; and “Wears hemp clothing with no sense of embarrassment.”

To me, Bushmaster’s test is a clear indication of the link between seemingly innocuous “jokes” that perpetuate gender stereotypes and the reality of gun culture and the violence it creates. Even though some will say this was just an advertising campaign, it really went beyond that—it took all the anger and violence involved in being male and weaponized it with the sole purpose of shaming men into owning guns to be more “manly.” And it did so at the expense of women, not only because “feminine” traits and activities were treated as bad things to be avoided at all costs in the test, but also because women have long been on the receiving end of male gun violence (and domestic violence in general).

In an article in the May/June 2019 issue of Crime & Justice in MotherJones titled “Armed and Misogynist: How Toxic Masculinity Fuels Mass Shootings,” author Mark Follman examined mass shootings since 2011 and found “a stark pattern of misogyny and domestic violence among many attackers” and “a strong overlap between toxic masculinity and public mass shootings.” He wrote, “Based on case documents, media reports, and interviews with mental health and law enforcement experts, we found that in at least 22 mass shootings since 2011—more than a third of the public attacks over the past eight years—the perpetrators had a history of domestic violence, specifically targeted women, or had stalked and harassed women. These cases included the large-scale massacres at an Orlando nightclub in 2016 and a church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, in 2017. In total, they account for 175 victims killed and 158 others injured. Two of the shooters bore the hallmarks of so-called ‘incels’—a subculture of virulent misogynists who self-identify as ‘involuntarily celibate’ and voice their rage and revenge fantasies against women online. A man who recently planned to carry out a mass shooting in Utah and another who opened fire outside a courthouse in Dallas also appeared to be influenced by incel ideas.”51

Let me make one thing very clear from the outset—none of this is an excuse for men who target and kill women. It is just vital that we consider the societal factors that lead to these incidents so we can learn more about how to prevent them. From the research, a laundry list of examples demonstrates it’s a certain kind of misogynistic, angry, bigoted, and toxic man who becomes a shooter. Furthermore, they often leave behind furious manifestos and display copious warning signs before taking the extreme step of murdering people in cold blood, because they either couldn’t deal with their anger or felt that the taking of life was the only way to truly feel powerful in a world that never saw them as the masculine ideal—which is sadly ironic since the “masculine ideal” is a cultural construct that lies to us in the first place.

The most notorious example of an incel who turned deadly is Elliot Rodger. In May 2014, Rodger killed six people on the University of California, Santa Barbara campus and injured fourteen others before turning the gun on himself. Rodger self-identified as an incel, leaving behind a 137-page manifesto along with YouTube videos calling for revenge on all the women who had rejected him (even though he never talked to most of them). Rodger was a bullied boy who believed wealth was inexorably tied to acceptance, and he grew to despise happy couples and loathed other boys who could be easily social and attract attention from the “hot blondes” he coveted. Because he had no idea how to cope with these feelings, he’d simply withdraw, skipping school to lose himself in World of Warcraft for weeks rather than deal with real life. The two things that he believed made a man a man—sex and money—were elusive to him. When he couldn’t gain attention from women, he turned to the pursuit of riches, spending thousands of dollars on lottery tickets, believing that if he were suddenly rich, he’d be drowning in women. Each time he lost, he sunk deeper into a tailspin of depression and toxicity, until he tried unsuccessfully to break in to a sorority house and settled for shooting women outside the house instead. The rantings from his manifesto reveal his warped reasoning for the shooting, the hate he was harboring for women, and the pain he felt at not fitting into the traditional model of masculinity—he resolved to destroy everything he believed he couldn’t have.52

And he’s far from alone in feeling this way.

In October 2015, Chris Harper-Mercer killed nine people and injured eight others before killing himself in a shooting at Umpqua Community College in Oregon. In his manifesto left for police at the scene, he looked up to other incel shooters like Rodger but criticized them for not killing more people. Like Rodger, he thought of himself as a loser who had nothing to live for and believed that he had failed to achieve the successes in life that he considered masculine. “My whole life has been one lonely enterprise. One loss after another. And here I am, 26, with no friends, no job, no girlfriend, a virgin,” he wrote.53

Scott Beierle killed two women in a yoga studio and injured four more in November 2018 after mentioning Rodger in videos on YouTube. An admitted member of the incel community, Beierle was also a military veteran and a substitute teacher who was fired from one job for allegedly asking a female student if she was ticklish and then touching her just below her bra line. He also had a history of arrests for grabbing women by their posteriors. In a familiar fit of irony, he would routinely talk of his intense hatred for women, but then in the next breath lament the fact that he didn’t have a girlfriend.54 Likewise, in December 2017, William Atchison killed two people before killing himself in New Mexico in a shooting at Aztec High School, where he had previously been a student. He had used the pseudonym “Elliot Rodger” and “Adam Lanza” (the Newtown, Connecticut, shooter) on several online forums, talked glowingly about the Columbine school shooting and praised Rodger and the incel community.55 Even Nikolas Cruz, the Parkland school shooter in Florida who killed seventeen people at Stoneman Douglas High School had previously written an online post saying “Elliot Rodger will not be forgotten.”56

Our current society is set up for men (especially white men) to thrive—because that’s who built the system. Men are set up to be the kings of the universe, who make $500,000 a year and are rolling in women. So our boys see what society expects from them, and it’s not surprising that when boys start to struggle socially as they try to meet these unrealistic standards, they are shocked when they can’t meet that bar. And because they’re also supposed to be emotional islands unto themselves who never ask for help and who must remain tough at all costs, they are unable to work through their isolation and emotional toxicity to learn healthy coping mechanisms. Therefore, when confronted with any kind of failure that threatens their fragile male ego, they resort to the only thing they know and have been taught— intense anger. Then anger turns to violence.

Shortly before writing this chapter, my oldest son started dating his first girlfriend. It did not go well, and in true sixth grade fashion, it was over before it even started and she broke up with him. So, I checked in on him to gauge how he was feeling and to teach him healthy ways to deal with his feelings. I told him people break up for all kinds of reasons, and that while it can be painful, it’s also a part of life. I reminded him that there would also be times in the future when he might need to break up with people, and that he should do so with respect while valuing the other person’s dignity (even if the people in your past don’t extend you the same courtesy). We talked about how even though he wanted her back, it was important to respect her decision and to not stalk her on social media or in real life because boundaries are essential. It all sounds like simple common sense, but how many parents actually have these conversations with their sons? I’ll bet it’s a shockingly low percentage, and as these boys grow into men, we’ll see a society that reflects this lack of vital communication.

Look, I’m not against responsible gun ownership, and I don’t believe in banning all guns; I have friends who hunt and who have taken me to the gun range, and it’s been fun. Groups like the National Rifle Association want to turn this into a Second Amendment debate, but parents need to know that’s separate from what we’re talking about here. Please talk to your sons about learning to deal with rejection in a healthy way. Talk to them about self-reflection and not blaming women for all of their woes. Discuss how vapid and superficial society’s norms are for men and point them in the direction of healthier alternatives. And if they really need it, get them counseling. If not, angry boys turn into angry men who still can’t deal with rejection—but who can meet the requirements to legally carry. I believe the most effective way we can battle gun violence is for parents of boys to start talking with them at an early age and help them avoid the rigid, harmful constraints of toxic masculinity that lead to a nearly all-male cast of mass shooters. Because that statistic is not a coincidence, and it cannot be ignored any longer.

PARENTING TIP #26: Embrace politics and discuss them with your kids

Just as height, hair color, and eye color are determined by genetics, so is politics, at least when your kids are still young—you have a very high chance of passing on your political views to your children. Kids are sponges and parents are their heroes, so they’re going to believe what you believe and they’re going to parrot your viewpoints in public and at school. You need to truly sit down and understand the ramifications of little people having outsized opinions that they don’t yet fully comprehend and that they may shout over the playground, because I can tell you with 100 percent certainty that it doesn’t just affect you; it impacts all of us. Once you’re aware of this, you can act accordingly.

Case in point, Will was seven years old and in the second grade when the 2016 presidential election kicked into high gear. Trump had kicked off his presidential bid by calling some Mexicans rapists and promising to build a border wall that Mexico would magically pay for, which began the intense and frequent vilification of immigrants and the day Will came home from school and said something that floored us. “Mom, Dad . . . you know how you told me about Trump and the Wall and people coming across the border? I think it’s fine if they get in line and ask permission to come in, but if they try to sneak in, then Trump has to shoot them to protect us, right?” My wife and I were stunned, and the horrified looks on our faces spooked him because he immediately started to get upset and backtrack. “I mean, I’m not talking about shooting the good ones. Just the ones trying to sneak in because those are the terrorists.”

We had told him most immigrants are hard workers who come here for a better life but through TV and friends he had absorbed “people crossing the border illegally are terrorists who have to be shot to protect the USA.” How did Will make this stunning 180-degree turn? It turned out a couple of other kids in his class—and let me remind you that we’re talking about kids in second grade—had told him those very words because they had heard it from their dads.

We sat a very upset and confused Will down (again) and talked to him about how important it is to understand that immigrants are not terrorists and that they do not deserve to be shot. This experience was a sobering one for me because it taught me a few important things about kids, parenting, and politics. First, kids will take whatever their parents say and use it in the way that makes the most sense to them. Second, an alarming amount of good parenting can be undone in a terrifyingly short amount of time by classmates and friends. And finally, the things we say as parents, even in the privacy of our own homes, will find an audience outside of those walls. If you’re a parent who is a xenophobic proponent of walls, it doesn’t matter if you don’t express that viewpoint publicly. If you do it in front of your kid, you must acknowledge that your views will be shared with the world one way or another. That is an awesome responsibility, and it’s one I wish parents would think about more often.

I’m also not ashamed to tell you that I’ve made a decision as a parent to disallow my children from hanging out with kids whose parents I know hold hateful views. This is a very sore issue in the parenting community, and many people believe I’m the one who is discriminating based on political views. But what we need to remember is these are not ordinary times. This isn’t a case of simply having opposing political views or policy differences. I disagreed on many, many issues when it came to past Republican nominees like John McCain and Mitt Romney, but even if they had won the presidency, I wouldn’t have been worried about the state of America. I wouldn’t be having a constant concern that our society is falling apart at the seams. I wouldn’t cringe every time I get on Twitter, out of fear of seeing the President of the United States tell a US citizen and Congresswoman of color to go back to Africa, while his pack of sycophantic “patriots” cheer and chant, “lock her up” and “send her back.” I wouldn’t be preventing my kids from hanging out with other kids whose parents do not share my politics. But the fact of the matter is we’re very much in uncharted territory, and I have a responsibility to bring my kids up in a healthy, safe environment that is about love, not hate. My kids and their values are too important for me to knowingly expose them to the dangerous and unhealthy toxicity of our times.

Some people will say, “Well, aren’t you just brainwashing your son with liberal ideas?” As I’ve mentioned, my kids will likely inherit my political views on the world anyway, and they’ll always have the chance to decide for themselves as they grow up and face the world. What’s important to me now is making sure I bring up my kids to be respectful, supportive, and compassionate. And by my definition, that means teaching them to fully support the rights for gay people to marry, as well as to be ardent supporters of trans rights. It means teaching them that while open borders aren’t the answer, a path to citizenship and humane treatment shouldn’t involve families separated and putting kids in cages. It means teaching them to advocate for equal pay for women and supporting common-sense gun laws. If my kids understand the simple concepts of consent and bodily autonomy for women to make their own reproductive health decisions, then I know I’m also bringing them up to be compassionate members of society. And my hope is that kids like mine will rub off on kids like the ones in Will’s second-grade classroom, instead of the other way around.

Not to mention these “political” discussions strike at the very heart of who people are and even how they identify. For example, the proper use of gendered pronouns have become a political hot button, and if you’re a parent who thinks you can whistle by the graveyard on this issue, you’ve got another thing coming. We now know that human sexuality is fluid, and kids are identifying in a variety of ways beyond he/him and she/her. While there are those who think political correctness and “PC culture” is nothing more than thought-policing people with more conservative viewpoints, why not teach your kids that respecting someone enough to identify them the way they feel most comfortable is simply common courtesy? Just as it’s no longer respectful to call Asian people orientals or use the word retard when talking about developmentally disabled people, it costs nothing to be kind to someone who wishes to be referred to as they/them.

Instead of desperately trying to avoid these “political” issues simply because they’re sensitive and they make you uncomfortable, it’s vital to get past that. Tackle these truly important topics head on because your kids will have to do the same very soon. Plus, if you don’t discuss it with your kids, trust me, they’ll hear it from someone else, and that gets real messy real fast.

PARENTING TIP #27: Teach boys (especially white boys) about privilege

I was in my early twenties when I first heard the phrase white privilege, and I didn’t like it one bit. Same for male privilege. As a straight white man, it made me feel like I couldn’t have a say in things or that I should feel guilty for the sins of my forefathers, with which I had nothing to do. So, I did what many other heterosexual, white males do when confronted with this topic—I dismissed it and made fun of the person delivering the message. It took the internet and joining a community of fathers from around the world who look very different from me and who talk openly and honestly about their experiences to turn me around on this important topic. Which, again, was not an easy thing. I despise having to admit I’m wrong, and holy hell, did I have to eat a ton of crow when it came to admitting the existence of privilege and coming to grips with the fact that I benefit from it daily. I’m perpetually grateful to the men in my life who (judiciously) told me what a blind idiot I was, because that lesson came just in time for me to teach my own boys about privilege.

What is white male privilege? The best way I have ever seen this explained is from a 2012 essay by John Scalzi titled “Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting There Is,” in which he compares life to a video game everyone is playing, except straight white males are playing on the easiest setting. “This means that the default behaviors for almost all the non-player characters in the game are easier on you than they would be otherwise. The default barriers for completions of quests are lower. Your leveling-up thresholds come more quickly. You automatically gain entry to some parts of the map that others have to work for. The game is easier to play, automatically, and when you need help, by default it’s easier to get.”57

And make no mistake, you can still lose while playing on the “straight white male” setting, just like people who play on more difficult settings can win. But just because you lost on the “straight while male” setting doesn’t mean the game wasn’t easier for you to play. And if you did win, it doesn’t diminish your accomplishments or insinuate that you didn’t work as hard or play as well. All it means is you had built-in advantages, most of which you would have never even noticed if you weren’t looking for them, because the game was set up to benefit you from the start. And the first step toward confronting white male privilege, if you are a white male person, is to recognize that fact. This explanation of privilege went over extremely well with my oldest, who is a devoted gamer, and he grasped what I was saying right away.

When I shared this to members of my family and my friends, some of them shook their heads and told me it wasn’t appropriate to have that conversation with a young kid who had done nothing wrong in the first place. Their argument was that he didn’t have a racist or misogynistic bone in his body, and the best thing we can do for our kids is to teach them to be colorblind and genderblind. They firmly believe, most of them with the best of intentions, that teaching kids not to see racial or gender differences is the way to go and the path to a truly enlightened society.

I understand where they’re coming from, but I disagree with that completely and vehemently.

It’s important to talk to boys about privilege because they need to understand our society’s problems before they can fix them. My boys need to know they will be paid more for doing the same job as women simply because they are men. They also need to know they are thirty percent more likely to be interviewed for that job in the first place because they have white-sounding names.58 I’m going to teach them about systemic racism and inherent gender bias because I need them to see and understand that differences in ethnicity and sex matter in this world, even though we wish they didn’t. Teaching white boys to be colorblind or blind to gender differences might be well-intentioned, but unfortunately it will lead to them being blind to the real-life disparities that will occur specifically because of these differences. Also, awareness of these discrepancies means parents can teach kids to advocate for marginalized peoples in a variety of ways. Whether it’s recognizing and calling out microaggressions; standing up to bullies who benefit from a systemic power structure; or even making the decision to purchase books, art, and cinematic entertainment created by underrepresented minorities, the recognition of privilege is a stepping stone to actions that directly benefit these communities.

Some people today will argue that there is no such thing as white male privilege, that the gender wage gap is a myth, and that we live in a post-racial society where meritocracy rules the day and everyone is on a level-playing field. They’ll also tell you that the entire concept of privilege is political correctness run amok, and they’ll point to #MeToo and all the famous white men brought down by recent scandals to flip the script and say it’s actually really difficult to be a white, straight man in society today, who is constantly under attack. Don’t listen to them, and don’t let your children be affected by these beliefs, because that is bullshit. The people who claim they are under attack are those who have finally been uncomfortably awoken to the fact that they can no longer continue getting away with getting away with things, like sexual harassment. And while these people are upset about a loss of privilege and having to reckon with their behaviors, the truth is black people were only granted the right to vote 150 years ago, while women earned the vote just 100 years ago. People of color didn’t truly earn anything resembling equal status until just more than 50 years ago with the Civil Rights Movement. In the span of human history, that is akin to yesterday. The effects of slavery still reverberate to this day, and women are still playing catch-up as well. Heterosexual white men have always enjoyed the systemic advantages set up and maintained by their straight white peers in power, and they will likely continue to do so well into the future. Our boys need to know this reality if they’re going to be able to help change things for the better. It’s common sense and essential to teach children while they are young, so we can begin to change the system from its roots.

Parents of white, straight boys can have these difficult conversations in gentle ways that doesn’t make them feel ashamed of being any of those things, while helping them understand they’re the beneficiaries of certain societal advantages not everyone else enjoys. Without that knowledge, they risk growing up and becoming people who feel like they’re losing equality simply because other people are gaining theirs.

PARENTING TIP #28: Talk to boys about bodily autonomy and boundaries

As parents, do you make your kids give people hugs? Grandparents, aunts, uncles—they all want hugs and kisses from little kids, and many aren’t shy about demanding them. I understand there’s a tendency to give in and tell your children to go over and provide adults with physical affection. I sure as hell didn’t think about any potential negative repercussions—not when I was a kid and not when I first became a parent. I was made to hug and kiss my relatives, even when I didn’t feel like it, so I carried on with that mindset with my own children.

But forcing children to provide physical affection to adults on-demand is not a good idea, says Dr. Jack Levine, an executive committee member on developmental and behavioral pediatrics at the American Academy of Pediatrics, because you’re taking away a child’s say in who they give affection to.59 And it makes sense— adults aren’t made to hug one another if they don’t want to, so why should kids not be extended the same courtesy? Granted, this can make things awkward at family gatherings if your kids decide they don’t want to give someone a hug, and some of your relatives might not take kindly to a perceived snub. But that discomfort pales in comparison to upholding bodily autonomy for your kids and allowing them to maintain their boundaries.

In fact, this is a precursor to future conversations with your child about the importance of consent, and it dovetails with the conversations you should already be having, even with young kids, about not letting anyone touch them if they’re not comfortable with it. Looking back, I felt foolish for telling my kids that no one could touch them if they didn’t want to be touched but then getting angry and forcing them to hug and kiss people when they really didn’t want to. For someone who values consistency, I was sending out quite the mixed message. It also sets up for a possibly problematic future scenario if a loved one or an authority figure ultimately becomes abusive in some way—if you’ve told your kids they have to hug and kiss someone, and that same person begins an abusive relationship, you’ve left that child at a decided disadvantage because they already feel they lack the agency to say no. It’s the same reason we have a rule at our house about tickling—if someone says “stop,” then it stops right then and there. I know it seems very mundane, and some might assume we have absolutely no fun at our house, but the fact of the matter is I can’t have more serious conversations with my kids about bodily autonomy and consent if I’m forcing them to give physical affection to other people against their will.

It’s also something boys can easily internalize and take in an unfortunate direction. If they see little girls being forced to provide people with physical affection even when they’ve said no, that becomes a baseline and a norm that can carry over into how they view romantic relationships later on in life—even on a subconscious level. It reinforces the mistaken belief that even if girls don’t want to provide intimacy, they have to if they’re told. And frankly, I believe it’s one of the factors in play regarding male politicians and how they seek to restrict bodily autonomy for women in the form of abortion legislation.

I should admit, right off the bat, that this is a very personal topic for me. In 2010, my wife MJ and I were trying for our second child, and we endured three miscarriages. When we got one that stuck, we anxiously sat on the news until the traditional twelve-week mark when the risks of loss plummet dramatically. I remember weeping tears of joy during the ultrasound and squeezing MJ’s hand because we had finally made it through all that loss, and soon we’d give Will the brother or sister he so desperately wanted. And we were due on New Year’s Eve, no less. Then came the dreaded call from the radiologist, telling us he’d like us to come in for one more “precautionary” ultrasound because he had noticed something about the baby’s legs.

At sixteen weeks, we found out our baby had Sirenomelia, also known as Mermaid Syndrome, where the legs are fused together. Worse than that, the baby was missing vital organs needed for survival outside the womb, such as kidneys, an anus, and a bladder. Doctors told us the condition occurs in 1 out of every 100,000 pregnancies. While our baby was still alive and had a remote chance of living until birth, we were told there was “zero chance” for survival outside the womb. In an instant, we went from our plans of being a family of four to having to choose between waiting two weeks until they could get us into the hospital in Boston, at which point we ran the risk of MJ having to deliver a stillborn, or going to an affiliated clinic for an abortion.

We took a day to consider which of the two impossibly heartbreaking options we wanted to run with, as if it were the worst Choose Your Own Adventure Book on the planet. In the end, MJ and I opted for what we believe was the most merciful option for our baby—the abortion. The thought of waiting another two weeks with a dying baby inside of her and then potentially having to deliver said baby stillborn was too much for MJ to bear. On the day of the procedure we pulled into the Brookline clinic, and there they were—religious anti-choice zealots set up on the perimeter of the property, holding up signs featuring unborn children and screaming at people entering the clinic. These people, who didn’t know us or our situation, woke up that day and decided the best use of their time was to shame perfect strangers on one of the toughest days of their lives for making a perfectly legal and safe reproductive health decision. A decision, by the way, that was absolutely none of their business. I wrapped my arm around MJ and whispered, “Ignore these ignorant fucks,” but even with the thirty-five-foot buffer zone that was in place at the time (and has since been declared unconstitutional) across busy Harvard Avenue, we heard them. The last thing we heard as we entered the clinic was how we were murdering our unborn baby.

As soon as we got in the door through security, MJ lost it. She broke. And let me tell you, despite not believing in the version of Hell with Satan and pitchforks, I discovered that day that hell is actually real. Not only that, it’s right here on Earth. Spend twenty minutes watching the love of your life moan and wail and convulse with sobs right before she goes in to literally have a life taken out of her, and you’ll come to the same conclusion. I stood there, helpless, as she was further tortured by informed consent laws that stipulate doctors are legally obligated to describe the procedure in excruciating detail even if you’ve already read up on it. Even if you tearfully beg them to stop talking. I felt my heart break into a million pieces as I watched her taken away to a surgery room where I couldn’t accompany her to comfort her. So yes, there’s a hell. And the people outside that clinic inexplicably help make it a reality by unnecessarily and cruelly shaming women.

I was a newspaper reporter at the time, and I knew my rights inside and out. I knew they were on a public sidewalk and absolutely had the right to say whatever they wanted. But I knew I could peacefully exercise my First Amendment rights as well. So, I took out my phone and started recording as I walked up to them and asked why they were doing what they were doing. I explained our situation and watched them flounder around for some kind of rationale for their terrible behavior. I listened to them babble on about suicide rates for women who get abortions. And then, in an amazing fit of irony, I watched as they threatened to call the police on me for recording them on a public sidewalk, as if their free speech was the only speech that is protected.

By the time I picked MJ up, the police were there, though the protesters had gone. MJ groggily asked, “What did you do?” with a wry, tired smile. Later that day (with MJ’s permission), I uploaded the video on YouTube and my website, where it soon garnered more than a million views and was picked up by news outlets all over the world. The reaction was swift and overwhelming, as I began hearing responses from all sides. The religious fanatics and anti-choice folks came out in droves to tell me I was a baby killer, accusing us of faking the whole thing and wishing death upon us via emails and online comments. They found my parents’ phone number and called them, too, screaming at my mom and dad for raising a murderer. But on the flip side—and the reason I’d do it all over again in a heartbeat—was when I started hearing from women all across the world. Women who had had abortions in the past and who had also been viciously harassed by people who think tormenting strangers is doing God’s work. Young women who couldn’t tell their parents and who had to walk that gauntlet alone. Older women who had had abortions twenty, thirty, and forty years ago, but who still remember the sting of shame and guilt from their verbal assailants. No matter their age, ethnicity, or location, they all said they wish they had been strong enough to fight back that day, or that they had had someone in their lives willing to be an advocate for them against that onslaught of judgment. And while the two people I had confronted that day were female, the women who had abortions and took the time to write me all expressed bewilderment and anger over the fact that so many of their detractors had been men.

Men whose bodies are unaffected by pregnancy. Men who will never have to make that difficult decision. Men who like the idea of a baby, but who will never have to push one out of his body. Let me tell you right now—any man who actively attempts to control a woman’s body by working to outlaw abortion is a misogynist.

Our boys need to know if you’re a man who wants to make abortion illegal, then you’re someone who wants to punish women for maintaining control of her own body. Look, no one likes abortion. Despite what the religious right would have you believe, women who get abortions and the men who support them are not throwing abortion parties and doling out free coat hangers on every street corner. What I’m teaching my boys is while you don’t have to like abortion, you do have to value choice and bodily autonomy. Because the minute you advocate for making abortion illegal, you become an advocate for stripping women of the basic right to control their own bodies and to make the reproductive health decisions that are best for them. And if abortion becomes illegal, which means it’s a crime with punishments, that means you’re in favor of punishing women for making decisions about their own bodies. That’s not okay. A woman’s right (and really, every human’s right) to control her own body should be sacrosanct, and boys and men should know they never have the right to dictate what someone else does with their own body.

I’ve talked about this topic with my oldest. He’s rightly uncomfortable about getting behind an idea that ends a pregnancy, which is understandable. But I explained to him that while it’s fine to be personally against abortion, it’s wrong to let your personal views restrict what someone else of the opposite sex does with her body, and he understands that now. More boys need to know that a girl’s body is not his to control, whether it’s about reproductive decisions or even the clothes she chooses to wear.

That last point, in particular, is difficult to convey thanks to Draconian dress codes still in effect at many schools across the nation, where bare shoulders, shorts or skirts above the knee, and even leggings are outlawed. Girls are routinely singled out and forced to either change into “appropriate” clothes or leave school altogether, and the reason often given is that their outfits create a distracting environment for boys.

Parents—and I can’t stress this enough—please push back against those dress codes and that mindset. When this occurs, the message we’re conveying is that girls are not only responsible for their actions, but they’re also responsible for the actions of boys as well. Did a boy sexually harass a girl in his class? Well, what was she wearing? As if her bare shoulders are an invitation or an excuse for boys to harass girls in any way, shape, or form. On the flip side, boys will continue to learn that they are not responsible for their actions because they are simply lust-fueled hormone monsters with no restraint once girls reveal even the most non-sexual parts of their bodies. Parents of boys need to hammer home the fact that boys and boys alone are responsible for their own actions. They need to know it doesn’t matter if a girl comes to class naked; that still doesn’t give anyone the right to assault or harass her. Boys are responsible for their own behaviors, and if they can’t focus in class because they’re distracted by a girl’s appearance, that’s on them. By making girls cover up, we are telling boys that they have the power to influence the appearance of girls, and it tells girls that their body isn’t just theirs, it’s subject to the whim of the male gaze.

Talk to your boys and instill in them personal accountability and the importance of boundaries and autonomy at all levels, even if it means refusing Aunt Mary for a hug.

PARENTING TIP #29: Teach boys about consent and how not to contribute to rape culture

If we want to teach our sons how to respect our daughters, we first have to talk about rape culture. Because rape culture is not just about the act of rape; it’s about the culture and codes of behavior that lead men to rape, that normalize sexual violence, and that blame victims while pardoning perpetrators.

History in general has not been kind to women who have come forward with allegations of sexual impropriety by men, especially powerful men. According to a June 2019 report from ABC News, “at least 17 women have accused Donald Trump of varying inappropriate behavior, including allegations of sexual harassment or sexual assault, all but one coming forward with their accusations before or during his bid for the White House.”60 But instead of putting the full force of the law behind investigating Trump and these disturbing allegations, society has placed the spotlight and burden of responsibility on Trump’s accusers. Why didn’t they come forward sooner? What were they wearing at the time? What’s their dating history look like?

Perhaps that shouldn’t come as a surprise since former President Bill Clinton famously abused the power of his office two decades ago when he conducted an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Although Clinton went on to be impeached (but not removed from office), it was Lewinsky who endured the brunt of the shaming despite being on the wrong end of a power differential—for tempting Clinton and engaging in a relationship with a married man. But it was Trump’s infamous Access Hollywood tape, released shortly before the election, that was most jarring: “You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful . . . I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.” The reaction from the American public was to elect him president less than a month later and excuse his remarks as simple “locker room talk.”61

Perhaps the ugliest display of blame-the-victim rape culture occurred in the fall of 2018, just prior to the start of the confirmation hearings for Trump’s nominee for the United States Supreme Court, Brett Kavanaugh. Reports surfaced that a Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, had accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault during a Maryland house party when the pair were both teenagers in 1982. This set up a showdown and dueling testimony in front of the Senate, in which Blasey Ford tearfully and fearfully recounted her memories of being assaulted that day by an inebriated teenage Kavanaugh, while Kavanaugh denied every allegation. It was painful watching Blasey Ford on television, clearly on public trial to defend her truth, only to be interrogated about what and how much she drank that day, her prior sexual partners, and whether she had political motivations to sabotage Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court chances. Kavanaugh, who came off angry and annoyed at the audacity of even being questioned on the topic, spent the day yelling at the people whose job it is to question the character of potential justices who serve for life. Kavanaugh’s nomination was eventually approved, and he now sits on the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Blasey Ford’s life has been upended by the ordeal, requiring her to move residences and engage months of security detail to protect herself from the people angry at her for simply speaking up against her alleged assailant.62

According to statistics from the National Sexual Violence Resource Center, one in five women will be raped during their lifetimes. Just as troubling is the fact that 63 percent of sexual assaults—with both men and women victims—are not reported to police.63 And when you look at the troubling cases of women accusing powerful men of sexual impropriety, it’s not difficult to understand why so many victims choose not to come forward with their stories when the pattern is for society to blame and punish them.

Are there instances of women who lie about being sexually assaulted? Yes. But while we should always maintain the standard of innocent until proven guilty, that doesn’t mean we should demonize accusers from the outset. If your first instinct is to ask a victim what they were wearing or why they were wherever they were when they were raped, as if their wardrobe or geographic location were in any way their fault, then you should dig a little deeper to ponder why you’ve not asked the perpetrator instead why they decided to rape and commit a crime.

This is rape culture—not just the reprehensible behavior of presidents, but the attitudes that everyday people hold that can reflect back onto your kids.

So, how can parents of boys combat this deeply engrained rape culture? For starters, it can begin with educating them about the concept of consent—something far more complex and nuanced than most parents convey to their sons. As I’m writing these words, I’m dealing with my oldest son having his first girlfriend. We’ve always been a family who talks about everything out in the open and without shame—correct anatomical names for body parts, homosexuality, the basics of sex, where babies come from, etc.—but it’s different when it goes from an abstract idea to an actual person with a name and a face and a personality. Things got very real very quickly, and suddenly I felt I had so much to share with Will and absolutely no time to do it all because there he was, entering middle school, with a girlfriend. Granted, as far as I can tell, having a girlfriend at this age mostly means awkward Instagram posts and being embarrassed when your friends bring it up while hardly ever seeing in the other person, but still—my kid is dating!

That begged the question: where do I start? As a father, this is a seminal moment, and I knew that how I handled it would set the foundation for all our future discussions on the topic. While I knew I couldn’t just make him drink from the fire hose when it comes to dating advice, I also felt that there was just so much he needed to know. So one night, just before bed, I asked Will if I could talk to him because I thought it was important that we have a chat now that he’s a big shot with a girlfriend. As I sat on the edge of his bed, he wore the same look on his face that I did when I knew my parents were about to have “The Talk” with me. It was equal parts awkwardness, anxiety, and revulsion.

Thoughts of that talk from twenty-five years ago raced through my head as I searched for just the right words and approach to be effective with Will. My dad was (and still is) a wonderful father who imparted many important lessons, which led to me being a (mostly) good person, but I have to admit that his lessons on relationships were a little lacking. One of his messages stuck with me in particular. It was about consent: “Don’t do anything with a girl unless she says yes first.” Surely that’s a good message, if a tad simplistic. Heterosexual men should absolutely not engage in any sexual activity with a woman if she hasn’t given her consent, right? Except my still-forming teenage brain took that to mean: “As long as she says yes, we’re good.” And it took me more than a decade to realize that’s a problem. First of all, it sets men up as the automatic initiators and women as the gatekeepers, and it ignores the fact that women can initiate and that men, too, do not automatically consent every time.

Second, it created an unhealthy mindset in me: I spent my later teens and college years doing everything possible to “get to yes” with girls. I knew I couldn’t do anything without consent, because that meant it would be rape. But you don’t have to rape someone to contribute to rape culture, and I absolutely did exactly that in my quest for yes. If I was dating a girl who was on the fence about having sex, I did everything I could to persuade her to consent. I’d buy her flowers, write her poems, and use those nice gestures as proof that I deserved sex. I begged, I pleaded, I cajoled, I manipulated, and I guilted my way to yes with more of my girlfriends than I care to admit, without ever realizing how problematic my actions were at the time. I was so used to the men I’d see on TV and the men I knew in my social circles who would talk about all the things they were doing to get girls to “put out” that I just assumed that was how it was done and conformed to the hive mentality without examining my actions. It wasn’t until shortly after MJ and I were dating that I overheard her talking with some girlfriends about the pathetic guys in their lives who begged for sex—these men were so annoying and persistent in their pursuits that the women finally just gave in and slept with them just to get these guys off their backs. I remember breaking in to that conversation to ask how often that happened, and each and every one of them said it was entirely commonplace.

It stunned me for several reasons. First of all, I realized I was that guy. I was the obnoxious clown begging and angling for sex at every turn, the pathetically sad man they were referring to at that very moment. Secondly, it dawned on me that women were having sex not because they really wanted to, but because they had decided it was easier to do that than to deal with persistent nagging from guys like me. I vividly recall feeling, in that moment, how sad the situation was and how utterly clueless and stupid I had been. Because every time I had to negotiate with a woman to say yes, I celebrated in my head, and what I had been celebrating was actually a woman I had worn down to the point of her half-heartedly agreeing to have sex just so I’d shut up. It never dawned on me that consent shouldn’t be the only goal. I was missing enthusiasm and eagerness. I had been looking solely for permission instead of making myself the type of person with whom women actually wanted to have sex with, freely and without reservation.

All this time I had fancied myself a good guy, simply because I had never raped anyone. As if not raping someone is a bragging point or badge of honor for men! That’s how low we have stooped. And the entire time, I had been contributing to toxic masculinity by not understanding the complexities of consent and how men constantly put women in no-win positions that breed negativity and resentment. And I wondered why my relationships never went anywhere, and why sex had always been about conquests and tally marks as opposed to caring about the experience of the other person. Let me tell you, it is beyond jarring to realize you’re a central part of the problem you always thought you were fighting against. Even though it was embarrassingly late in my life when I realized all this, it’s now my mission to impart these lessons as early as possible to my boys so they’re not as humiliatingly behind the curve as I was.

So, with all those thoughts swirling in my head as I perched on the edge of my oldest son’s bed, my mind raced to find a way to convey that to him in a manner an eleven-year-old could comprehend. The conversation didn’t begin so well as I stumbled around to find the words, and his cocked head and raised eyebrows told me I was failing to land my main points. He started to lose interest and began playing with our Maine Coon out of boredom. As I tried to forge on, the cat grew increasingly uncomfortable and tried to jump off the bed, but Will held it there because he loves Bruno’s soft fur.

Then the lightbulb went off.

“Will, the cat doesn’t want you to pet it right now. Are you noticing his body language? The fact that he’s trying to get away? The meowing that lets you know he’s unhappy? He’s staying there for now because he loves you and doesn’t want to hurt you, but he’s clearly giving you multiple signs that he’d rather be somewhere else at the moment, and you’re ignoring those signs. You’re being selfish and you’re not respecting the cat, who is clearly conveying that he wants to leave. Do you think it’s right that just because you’re bigger and stronger than he is that you get to decide what he does and where he can go? Buddy, this is what consent is. Think about if the cat were your girlfriend right now.”

The look on his face told me everything I needed to know. It had landed.

“Oh,” he said thoughtfully, his eyes going wide. “Oh wow! I totally get what you’re saying now. That actually makes a lot of sense.”

The irony here is that I hate cats. Detest them in a very primal way, actually. I’ve been trying to make my house cat-free for as long as I’ve been dating MJ, and this particular cat used to crap in my shoes (only my shoes, never anyone else’s). It served as my personal nemesis. But that night, he was exactly what I needed to teach my kid a very important lesson I personally didn’t learn until I was in my twenties.

The lesson about consent that I hope to impart to the parents reading this book is to talk to your kids about it early, often, and completely. Every kid is different, and you know your kids best, but I urge you not to put it off too long. If you do, you risk ending up with a boy who hopefully knows not to rape but who also has no clue he’s contributing to toxic and harmful behavior that doesn’t benefit him, women, or society in general. More than that, you’re sentencing him to a sex life that consists of keeping score instead of scoring a point for the fulfillment of both parties. Besides, there’s no reason enthusiastic consent shouldn’t be sexy and wonderful. After all, if the other person says yes, then that’s terrific!

Not letting your boys succumb to rape culture doesn’t just end with a conversation about consent. It’s also about being cognizant of the movies they watch, the music they listen to, and the video games they’re playing. It’s about telling them, in no uncertain terms, that “locker room talk” should never include kissing women against their will, grabbing their genitalia, and joking about sexual assault. It’s about showing them the Brock Turners of the world and how wrong it is for the media narrative to focus on the loss of his swimming scholarship at Stanford instead of how he had raped an unconscious woman, and it’s about how wrong it is for Turner’s father to claim his son shouldn’t go to prison just for “twenty minutes of action,” when that action was rape.

It’s Time to Get Controversial

MY GRANDMOTHER ALWAYS SAID, “NEVER TALK POLITICS OR religion.” But she didn’t live in the age of Make America Great Again, alternative facts, Twitter, the twenty-four-hour news cycle, and this batshit-crazy climate in which truth seems to matter less than blind allegiance. So, with apologies to Grandma, I’m about to get pretty controversial because it is not only impossible to avoid talking about these things in front of or with your children; it’s also shortsighted and, I’d argue, irresponsible.

Racism, misogyny, bigotry, and alpha-male nonsense has always been present in American culture, so I’m not blaming Donald Trump’s rise to power for the introduction of these societal ills. What I am saying, without an ounce of hesitation or equivocation, is that since Trump became president in 2016, he has legitimized and even encouraged these belief systems. Because of Trump, fellow morons feel enabled to spew their toxic bullshit in public, and it’s quickly becoming the norm. He’s cleared the way for white nationalists to come out of their basements and into the mainstream, made pussy-grabbing a presidential trait, turned back the clock on the LGBTQ+ movement, and single-handedly made being an egomaniacal strongman fashionable while simultaneously vilifying what we’ve always considered good leadership qualities—having experience, education, and a calm demeanor. It’s as if we elected as president the comments section of every terrible online article. We took our collective drunk, racist uncles and put him in the Oval Office. We set ourselves back a-yet-to-be-determined number of years as a country by giving in to our worst and most basic tendencies. And we did it all in front of our kids.

Make no mistake, our kids are watching, and they’re soaking this in like sponges. It’s not all about Trump, either. Listening to progressive Democrats swear up and down that they want a woman to be president but then refer to Hillary Clinton as “shrill” or claiming that all of the female presidential candidates have an “electability” problem is frustrating and hypocritical beyond belief. The fact remains that everything feels more polarized now because the issues we’re discussing aren’t just political—they’re representative of our values as a society.

If you’re a parent who is currently bringing up young children during these watershed times of Trump’s presidency, you have even more cause to be vigilant and to talk about politics openly with your kids. This isn’t just immigration we’re talking about; it’s whether we’re okay with family separation and locking kids up in cages. It’s not just Supreme Court nominations at stake; it’s literally the ability of women to control their own reproductive health decisions. It’s not just agreeing or disagreeing on environmental policy decisions; it’s recognizing we’re at a tipping point regarding climate change that will determine the sustainability of the planet for the current generation. Not to mention that young people today are paying special attention to how messages of these environmental issues are being treated, specifically Greta Thunberg, the seventeen-year-old Swedish climate change activist who has been repeatedly mocked by the President of the United States for her outspoken nature. It’s also impossible to ignore the fact that transgender soldiers are no longer deemed fit to serve in our military, while discrimination protections don’t apply to members of the LGBTQ+ community in certain states due to religious exemptions. The point is parents who say they don’t want to talk about politics or controversial topics are really saying they don’t want to talk about issues that impact all of us—and these issues are too important to society and to our kids for us to remain silent.

Perhaps the number one complaint I get on my social media channels and website is “I followed you for parenting stuff, not politics, so stick to talking about fatherhood.” But that, my friends, is utter crap. You can’t separate politics from parenting because politics impacts everything we do in society. The laws that govern us, the policies under which we have to live—it’s all political, and it’s all going to come up in the course of raising children.

So, let’s just dive right into what is arguably the most important and heartbreaking issue in America today—gun culture and mass shootings.

PARENTING TIP #25: Don’t let boys fall victim to gun culture

Three mass shootings occurred during the time it took for me to write this chapter. Three. All of the shooters were men. There can be no more whistling by the graveyard when it comes to men and mass shootings, and parents need to know that male anger and the inability to deal with rejection or meet society’s masculine ideals is resulting in violent deaths.

“Because I’m really angry.”

That’s what nineteen-year-old Santino William Legan reportedly said when someone in attendance at the Gilroy Garlic Festival asked him why he was going on a shooting spree, which resulted in the deaths of three people, including a six-year-old boy. According to news reports, Legan bought an AK-47-style weapon just before the July 2019 incident (in neighboring Nevada, where the gun laws are more lax than California), referenced a neo-Nazi manifesto that targeted women and minorities on Instagram, sneaked through a fence, and started gunning people down before police killed him. But not before a witness, quoted by multiple news outlets, shouted out, “Why are you doing this?”, to which Legan issued the horrifyingly chilling but all-too-common answer. “Because I’m really angry.”45

I was putting together this chapter in July 2019 when this tragedy occurred, and truth be told, I was struggling mightily with the writing. Every statistic out there tells a story we already know—that the overwhelmingly majority of mass shootings are perpetrated by men. Most of them white men. Many of them angry. Angry at minorities who they see as taking over society and taking what’s theirs (El Paso Walmart shooting). Angry at women for not paying them enough attention or not sleeping with them on command (Tallahassee yoga studio shooting). Just . . . angry. But while I can cite statistics all day long, I was struggling to properly convey just how much our warped gun culture and gun violence are very much a male problem that ties in directly to toxic masculinity and how men view themselves in the world. I must’ve started and then deleted this chapter twenty times because I couldn’t get it right. And then came Santino William Legan and his white male anger.

When searching for a common denominator in mass shootings, a lot of people go right to mental illness. But a University of Texas research study from February 2019 found that “counter to a lot of public opinion, having a mental illness does not necessarily make a person more likely to commit gun violence” and that “a better indicator of gun violence was access to firearms.”46 However, the one thing that can’t be denied when examining gun violence (and violent crimes in general) is that almost all of the attacks are carried out by men. An FBI report from 2014 titled “A Study of Active Shooter Incidents in the United States Between 2000 and 2013” found that of 160 such incidents, only six were committed by women.47 That means more than 96 percent of those incidents saw men pulling the trigger. This makes gun violence very much a problem perpetrated by men.

Not many people want to talk about this generation of men that is killing others and themselves, though. It’s much easier to blame it all on mental illness instead of acknowledging how our culture of toxic masculinity turns boys into men who are unfeeling, robotic, and completely lacking in coping mechanisms. That’s probably why, according to a report by the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, men are four times as likely to commit suicide compared to women.48 Meanwhile, the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention found that nearly 51 percent of suicides in 2017 involved firearms.49 And you know what the craziest thing is? It seems to me we already know the answer.

We raise our boys to be tough at all costs. They are not allowed to cry. They are mocked and ridiculed if they openly express their feelings. They are told to be strong and silent and to never seek help, because “real men” figure things out on their own. They are told to be dominant and aggressive in sports, work, dating, and life in general. Then, after we’ve stunted their development as fully formed human beings and made them incapable of having any kind of wherewithal to be emotionally intelligent and competent, know what we do? We arm them.

Yup, we create hypermasculine male automatons and raise them in a toxic stew soaked with misogyny and stoked by racism, but we give them none of the tools to understand or cope with their surroundings. Eventually, they succumb to these alpha male attitudes, and the bullied become the bullies. Then, somewhere along the way, we hand them one of the 300 million guns in circulation today. Then we make ownership of said gun a central component to their manhood, and suddenly, confused and angry-as-fuck men are now holding legally purchased killing machines as they hop onto Reddit and 8chan to discuss far-right manifestos and blame women and minorities for everything that hasn’t gone right in their lives. And when all that violence and anger in which they’ve been raised finally bubbles to the surface, and these men have no idea what a healthy coping mechanism looks like, it becomes easier just to grab the gun—which will only end in two possible ways, and neither of them are good.

To make things worse is how we talk about guns, shootings, and the cause of all the violence after it happens, as if we don’t already know the answer. What do we do as a society when these men blow up and hurt themselves and/or others? We throw our hands up in feigned confusion and shout to the heavens, “Why is this happening?” and “What could possibly make someone do this?” Well, you have most of your answer. This happens because of a confluence of events and factors that are part and parcel of the toxicity in which we raise men, combined with an embarrassingly easy access to guns in this country. This is the reason you see so few female shooters. This is the inevitable conclusion to the terrible way we box men in emotionally and raise them in what amounts to a microwave that blasts and cooks together toxic masculinity, misogyny, and white supremacy.

I disagree completely with those of you who say, “It’s mental illness, dumbass!”, or who blame violent video games for gun violence. Countries all over the world contain people who suffer from mental illness; and kids from all nationalities are playing Grand Theft Auto and other video games. Also, both men and women are susceptible to mental illness. Yet, despite the fact, they are not shooting up malls, grocery stores, and music festivals with the appalling frequency of the incidents in the United States. Why? Because of the inordinate number of guns the United States has in circulation, the embarrassingly lax background checks in far too many states to own one, and this country’s uniquely warped gun culture and version of masculinity. I understand it’s easier to blame the mental health boogeyman, but doing so only ignores the actual problem of how intrinsically intertwined masculinity and gun ownership is.

And if you think that gun companies don’t already realize this and actively tap into it, then let me tell you a tale about how one gun company advertised to men for two years prior to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.

In 2010, Bushmaster Firearms began an advertising campaign that will long live in my mind as the gold standard of poisonous, dangerous, and irresponsible marketing. That was the year the company began running promotions that featured an AR-15 rifle with five simple words splayed across the front: “Consider Your Man Card Reissued.”50 The implication is quite clear—if you’re a real man (and you can always tell the real ones from the fake ones because they have their handy dandy Man Card at the ready), you own a gun. If you don’t own a gun, well, then have a seat on the bench, Sally. Because what could go wrong by insinuating you need to own a weapon that can fire thirty bullets in rapid succession to rightfully consider yourself masculine?

A Sample Post with Comments

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa a link to know where qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. a link to know where

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, style sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Great typography and bold imagery speak volumes about quintessential topics

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia a link to know where deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. a link to know where

Great typography and bold imagery speak volumes about quintessential topics

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

A guide to styling and making Volume your own

Completely rebuilt with GeneratePress Premium 2.0, Volume ( remastered ) is a fresh clean site for bloggers . With new Post Archive cards, Single Post Heros, Sidebar Author Box and revisited Featured Post Navigation all built with GPP 2.0 Block Elements.

Stripping away 5 custom hook elements and over 350 lines of code you can now restyle entire theme elements with Block Elements and GenerateBlocks.

GP Premium 2.0 Theme Building

GPP 2.0 introduced a major upgrade to the Elements Module. With GPP and GenerateBlocks you can now deliver dynamically generated block built content across your entire site.

If you want more of a low down on Theme Building, check out our YouTube channel where Block master Leo Hsing will walk your through just some of the things you can do with it. But lets dig in and show you where Volume brings these new features to your new GP Site.

Where to begin

There are 3 main interfaces that are used to customize and build the site.

  1. The Customizer
    this is where you will find the global styling controls for the theme. From Colors and Typography to Navigation and Widget Areas. If you find theres not a control for one the elements your trying to style then check out #3.
  2. The Post Editor
    In Volume our posts are simply Block Based content. But we have included a Manual Excerpt in some of our Posts that is displayed in a Page Hero Block Element and our Custom Archive Post Cards. If theres some content above or below your post that you cannot see in the editor then once again check out #3.
  3. The Elements Module
    This is where the cool stuff happens. Across the site you will see a Custom Single Post Hero, Custom Post Cards on our archives, an Author Box at the top of our right sidebar, and Custom Navigation on archives and Single Posts.

Wherever possible we have defined our default styles in the Customizer. However some Elements are directly styled in the Elements Module.

What Elements are in place

Head on over to Dashboard > Appearance > Elements to check out what we have prebuilt for you:

  • Archive Navigation
    A simple previous / next Page button configuration located after the post archives and home page.
  • Post Navigation
    A previous / next post navigation with post title and featured image background located just before the footer on every single post.
  • Author Box
    Positioned over the sidebar, the author box will display Avatar Name, the User Bio and a link to the authors archives.
  • Post Cards
    here is our Content Template for our Blog / Post Archives. This is the global style for all cards except for the First Featured Post. Which is using the following Child Element
  • – First Post Template
    Set specifically to display for the first post of the first page of your archives.
  • Single Post Hero
    The Full Width responsive Hero element for our single posts. Please note the following Merged Header
  • Merged Header
    This simply applies a Merged Header for our single post, where custom site header and navigation colors are set to give them their transparent background.

A note on Images

The Volume site preloads a series of images whose sizes are: 1024 by 576 pixels which is a nice 16:9 Aspect ratio. In general the theme has the images set to medium-large which displays the image at 768px x 432px.

You can of course choose to upload large images, but its always best to maintain your images sizes and if you choose to use larger ( or smaller ) image size then try and keep the aspect ratio the same.